Muni operators say their current salary structure is preventing them from making ends meet in the increasingly expensive San Francisco Bay Area. (Kevin Kelleher/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Muni operators say their current salary structure is preventing them from making ends meet in the increasingly expensive San Francisco Bay Area. (Kevin Kelleher/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Union blasts SFMTA over Muni operator wages

Muni operators’ union leader says the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency needs to be “on blast” for its treatment of drivers.

Eric D. Williams, president of the Transport Workers Union Local 250-A, spoke with the San Francisco Examiner in response to a story in Monday’s paper, which detailed how Muni workers hired in the last year had their pay cut nearly in half under a 2014 contract. But now, a year later, those drivers are sounding a cry, saying they can’t make ends meet on that pay.

“We’ve got to put the agency on blast for what we’re doing to our members,” Williams said.

The SFMTA previously told the Examiner that Muni operators are among the highest paid in the nation and that they enjoy generous benefits.

While most Muni operators make anywhere from $60,000 to $70,000 a year, according to public records, 818 Muni operators who were hired after July 1, 2014, make 63 percent of that pay under a relatively new contract quirk.

Those operators are paid as low as $37,000 a year, before union dues and benefits.

An operator’s salary is then increased in “steps” over five years. After five years, operators earn full pay. That step payment system is the source of contention for Muni drivers, some of whom say they can’t afford basic goods for themselves or their families.

By contrast, AC Transit has a step in its salary for operators between three and four years. Before July 2014, SFMTA operators’ step salary period was 18 months.

Williams said the reduced pay may lead to drivers quitting Muni. And less drivers, he said, mean late buses.

According to the SFMTA, 60 of the 818 new operators hired since July 1, 2014, have quit the agency or did not show up for initial training. An unreliable workforce also strains other operators, who must pick up the slack, Williams said.

“Overtime is still through the roof,” Williams said, “The only way overtime goes through the roof is when you don’t have enough employees.”

Operators work overtime in difficult “split shifts,” in which the SFMTA stretches eight-hour operator shifts to 10 hours or more through extended unpaid breaks, operators told the Examiner. Many drivers said they work multiple jobs and otherwise could not afford to live in the Bay Area on an SFMTA salary, which is different than the compensation they expected.

“A lot of us left good paying jobs for a lie. I had a job making over $25 an hour,” said one operator, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Williams and operators allege the SFMTA does not properly warn operators of the new five-year payment system.

Responding to the criticism, SFMTA spokesman Paul Rose wrote via email, “… most employees within the city are on a similar pay/step scale. This information is always posted within the contract and on the website for all potential candidates who are considering the application process.”

Pay information is also communicated in the training offer letter, Rose said, and at an employee orientation prior to working for Muni.

Some operators rest the responsibility of that contract with Williams, who negotiated it.
At a TWU Local 250-A union meeting in December, operators openly questioned Williams’ ability to secure a successful contract for new operators. Former union president Irwin Lum agreed with that criticism.

During 2014 negotiations, Lum said, “Management did not expect to get the five-year progression. They were amazed Eric [Williams] agreed to it.”

Williams said he successfully negotiated a wage increase for members and that the five-year progression was a trade-off that could change in the future.

“To me, the union was out-maneuvered in the negotiations,” Lum said.

MuniSFMTATransitunionworkers

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Advocates with the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition hold a rally outside City Hall before the Board of Supervisors were to vote on a resolution supporting the creation of a public banking charter on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Should San Francisco run its own public bank? The debate returns

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Courtesy Anne Wernikoff/CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

Mayor London Breed spoke at the reopening of the San Francisco Public Library main branch on April 20. (Sebastian Miño-Bucheli/Special to The Examiner)
SF reopening more libraries through the summer

After a handful of San Francisco public libraries reopened last month for… Continue reading

A new production of Beethoven’s “Fidelio” directed by Matthew Ozawa and designed by Alexander V. Nichols will be onstage at the War Memorial Opera House in October. (Courtesy Alexander V. Nichols)
SF Opera announces transitional 99th season

Company returns to Opera House with downsized schedule, no fall ball

Most Read