Firefighters are seen at a back-burn operation to clear fuel that could help the fire jump Highway 29 in Calistoga, Calif., on Oct. 12, 2017. (Marcus Yam/Los Angeles Times/TNS)

Two new wildfire lawsuits filed against PG&E, more expected

Two new lawsuits have been filed against Pacific Gas and Electric Company in San Francisco Superior Court, claiming the utility’s negligence is responsible for the devastating Northern California wildfires.

One case was filed Thursday morning by three families in Redwood Valley in Mendocino County who fled for their lives early on the morning of Oct. 9 and lost their homes.

“We lost everything,” homeowner Nemesio Ruiz said at a news conference outside the San Francisco Superior Court courthouse.

SEE RELATED: SF mobilizes to help North Bay fire victims

Another lawsuit was filed in the same court late Wednesday by a Santa Rosa husband and wife who were severely burned as they ran through the flames on foot and their nightclothes caught on fire.

Attorney Bill Robins said he believes the lawsuit by Ulla and Lars Tandrup of Santa Rosa is the first to have been filed on behalf of burn victims.

Mary Alexander, a lawyer for the three Mendocino County families, said the new lawsuits join nine other cases previously filed in Sonoma County Superior Court.

Alexander said she expects more lawsuits to be filed and expects the state Judicial Council to assign all the cases to a single judge to
promote judicial efficiency.

She said she believes the cases should be handled in San Francisco Superior Court because The City is the headquarters of PG&E and its parent company PG&E Corp.

The lawsuits allege PG&E was negligent in failing to maintain and inspect its power lines adequately and failing to prune vegetation around the lines.

The danger of fire was reasonably foreseeable because of “the extended drought, high temperature, low humidity, tinder-like dryness of
vegetation and windy conditions,” the Ruiz lawsuit alleges.

In addition to negligence, the lawsuits include claims of emotional distress, creation of a nuisance, violation of state law and trespass by allegedly negligently caused fires.

A spokesperson for PG&E was not immediately available for comment.

The company has previously said it is focusing on maintaining public safety and restoring power and will support any reviews by relevant regulators and agencies.

Just Posted

BART: busking ban on trains may be legal despite opposition, free speech concerns

When BART board director Debora Allen first floated her proposal to ban… Continue reading

Report: Affordable housing fee hike could discourage new office development

Amended proposal for increase heads toward full board vote

Conservative mayoral candidate defends controversial billboard: ‘this is beautiful art’

Local elected officials denounce depiction of Mayor London Breed as ‘racist’

PG&E warns another round of power shutoffs possible starting Wednesday evening

PG&E Monday afternoon gave a 48-hour notice to approximately 209,000 customers in… Continue reading

SF police union dumps $50K into committee against DA candidate

San Francisco’s police union is preparing to spend big money to defeat… Continue reading

Most Read