Trustees considering parcel tax

PACIFICA — Drawing on reserves and grant money in recent years, the Pacifica School District will likely go out for a parcel tax on the city’s property owners to make up for inequities in state funding.

Local real estate agents are hesitant about the tax’s potential success at the polls and questioned whether it was the best way to bring funds to the district’s coffers. However, District Superintendent Jim Lianides said officials are hopeful that the recent approval of the Jefferson Union High School District bond measure was “symbolic of the community’s support for education.”

At its Wednesday meeting, the school district board is considering a $96 annual parcel tax over five years that would not differentiate between commercial and residential parcels, Lianides said.

The tax, if passed next May, would bring an estimated $960,000 annually to the district’s budget.

“Either we’re able to get an infusion of extra cash or we’re going to have to initiate cutbacks for next year,” Lianides said, adding that the biggest part of their troubles was “inadequate funding from the state.”

Over the past six years, the district has cut $1.2 million in expenses, all the while continuing to perform at a high level, the superintendent said.

According to data from 2004-2005, Pacifica School District spends the second least of all San Mateo County school districts, spending $6,571 on each of the district’s roughly 3,100 students. It is 10th, however, out of the 23 school districts countywide in the state’s Academic Performance Index.

“We needed to show our community that we were spending their money wisely, which is what we’ve done,” Board President Joan Weideman said when asked why to seek a parcel tax now.

In addition to teacher training, the district wants the parcel tax, if approved, to attract and retain quality teachers, enhance its library services and prevent additional cutbacks to instructional programs, Lianides said.

Paul Benson, a real estate agent with Pacific Coast Real Estate, said he’d most likely support it but he had a “little bit of a sour taste” in his mouth after Measure L, the Rockaway Quarry measure that was voted down.

“Some balanced growth and development will expand the tax base, and that would preclude having a parcel tax for necessary services,” Benson said.

Re/Max Dolphin real estate agent Scott Findlay worried about past public outcry against such taxes, but said that the $96 per parcel tax wouldn’t impact the real estate market.

The Pacifica School District board will consider putting the parcel tax to a May 2007, all-mail ballot at its meeting Wednesday, Nov. 15 at 7:30 p.m. in the district offices, 375 Reina del Mar Ave. in Pacifica.

dsmith@examiner.com

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Legal challenge halts SFPD jurisdiction over dog attacks on federal land

Dog owners beware — canine attacks are now consequence-free on federal land… Continue reading

49ers battle with the Saints lives up to its billing

Kittle’s 39-yard catch-and-run had placed San Francisco in prime position for a game-winning field goal as the 49ers trailed 46-45

SF police shoot burglary suspect in Mission District

Man allegedly attacked officers before being shot in first on-duty SFPD shooting since June 2018

Not even heavy rain can stop the 25th annual SantaCon

Jolly, drunken fun event for Santas is the ‘least wonderful time of the year’ for many locals

Ronen says $100M service expansion is ‘going to fix’ SF’s mental health crisis

Compromise mental health plan has backing of mayor, full Board of Supervisors

Most Read