Affordability and displacement are two crises, but only one requires the creation of more homes.  (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

Affordability and displacement are two crises, but only one requires the creation of more homes. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

The old affordability-displacement switcheroo

The Board of Supervisors reached a rare consensus on housing, resolving both the affordable housing requirements of Proposition C and Supervisor Katy Tang’s Home-SF housing density bonus program, in negotiations characterized by an intensity that might lead a casual observer to believe it was Arafat and Rabin in Oslo.

The Chronicle celebrated the agreement on implementation of last year’s Prop. C, which raised affordable housing requirements in new development. The editorial described the proposition, backed by a landslide 68 percent of voters, as “ill-advised,” and expressed relief that the weaker brainchild of supervisors Ahsha Safai, London Breed and Tang “deservedly” thwarted the outcome of the election.

The editorial openly chided the electorate for having the moxy to demand more affordable housing, while cheering the moderates for standing up to stupid voters, rather than piling coverage on the political perils of defying the will of the people. Obviously, if progressive supervisors championed a policy at odds with the express will of the voters, the Chronicle would proclaim them out-of-touch flakes.

It is our flawed system that the legislator where a project is proposed generally makes the deal. All legislators, regardless of political stripe, have to fear backlash from constituents over allowing unpopular developments in the district. Typically, moderate supervisors don’t have enough development proposed in their quasi-suburban districts like the Sunset, Marina or Corona Heights to practice building consensus to get concessions that allow a development to proceed. Supervisors from Districts 3, 5, 6, 9 and even 10 have enough projects that they learn how to negotiate.

On the other hand, almost nothing has been built in Districts 2, 4 or 8, because those supervisors’ primary constituency is affluent homeowners. Former Supervisor Scott Wiener rezoned 341 Corbett Ave. as a park to stop it from housing the homeless, and Supervisor Mark Farrell turned the Francisco Reservoir into a park, despite offers from developers to build housing there. Which is why it’s notable that Tang navigated Home-SF passage to allow higher density development along commercial corridors on 200 soft sites.

The Examiner article about Home-SF quoted Todd David, the rookie head of the pro-development Housing Action Coalition, declaring victory for those who “think San Francisco’s affordability and displacement crisis requires more home creation.”

Except that affordability and displacement are two crises, and only one of them requires more home creation.

The affordability argument is that San Francisco didn’t build enough for decades and now housing growth isn’t keeping pace with population so we need to build more housing to meet the demand. Affordability boosters tend to dismiss the role of wealth inequality, loss of state and federal funding for affordable housing, speculative finance, transit and infrastructure, etc. But most of us agree that California needs to build more housing, which is still a long-term solution to a long-term problem. It does not solve displacement.

Home-SF is projected to add 5,000 units over the next 20 years, which will be worthless to all the people, including members of my family, forced to pack up and leave the state right now. Home-SF and Prop. C, and any other supply-side solution, at best slow the rate of growth in housing costs over years. They don’t house the homeless or stop evictions. The answer to displacement is expanding rent control, restricting evictions, restricting Airbnb, funding legal defense for tenants, public funding for homeless services, and so on. Those policies keep people in their homes.

Affordability is more attractive politically because there’s money to be made from it. There’s no money to be made stopping displacement. That’s not to say that a public debate over how much, where and on whose dime housing should be added is not worthwhile. It absolutely is, but using affordability as the answer to displacement is like giving a bike helmet to someone after they get hit by a car. That person needs a doctor, not a condescending lecture about why they should have worn a helmet.

Nato Green is a San Francisco-based comedian and writer. Pester him on Twitter @natogreen or see him live at Verdi Wild Things Are at the Verdi Club on June 8.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Crab fisherman Skip Ward of Marysville casts his crab net out off a pier near Fort Point. (Craig Lee/Special to The	Examiner)
San Francisco came back to life, and we captured it all

Last spring, in the early days of the pandemic, the bestselling authors… Continue reading

Revelers at Madrone Art Bar in the early hours of June 15, 2021 (Courtesy Power Quevedo).
No social distancing at Motown-themed dance party

‘I don’t care how anyone feels, I just want to dance!’

<em>The San Francisco Peace Pagoda stands tall in between Japan Center East and West malls.</em>
 (Ida Mojadad/The Examiner)
Patrons return to the Japantown mall

‘We’re so happy—it’s really hard to make a profit’

Scenes from an SFO-bound BART train on Tuesday, June 15, 2021, the day California fully reopened for business after the COVID pandemic. (Al Saracevic/SF Examiner)
SF reopens: BART riders dreading the end of the pandemic

‘I’ve forgotten what it’s like to be packed like sardines’

Micael Butial stands as he holds an umbrella that he painted with the words “Stop Asian Hate” at a rally held to show support for Asian and Pacific Islanders communities, Sunday, March 21, 2021 in San Francisco. (Photo by Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Inside the California organization tracking anti-Asian hate incidents

By Mallika Seshadri CalMatters Richard Lim was walking along a quiet sidewalk… Continue reading

Most Read