As pandemic-related protections for tenants expire, the number of eviction cases is expected to grow rapidly. (Jessica Christian/2014 S.F. Examiner)

As pandemic-related protections for tenants expire, the number of eviction cases is expected to grow rapidly. (Jessica Christian/2014 S.F. Examiner)

The clock never stopped for many eviction cases

As emergency orders expire, evictions set to increase

While California officials scramble to enact emergency eviction protections before the current ones expire, San Francisco tenant advocates warn that cases are already piling up.

The state’s Judicial Council on Thursday rescinded emergency rules that have stopped most eviction proceedings since April; the rules are now set to expire on Sept. 1. That has triggered a race against time in the California Legislature to pass competing eviction bills with two-thirds of the vote.

“We’re all fearing the worst,” said Ryan Murphy, supervising attorney at the Eviction Defense Collaborative. “There’s going to be a flood of cases that have been saved up for months and months. The courts are totally ill-equipped to deal with cases.”

That spells even worse news for the people facing the types of evictions that never stopped completely. Landlords were still allowed to bring or continue cases to do with nuisance, public health, and some pre-coronavirus grievances.

From March 17 to June 30, at least 158 cases have come through the doors of EDC, which manages The City-funded legal counsel program for tenants facing evictions.

About 37 percent were due to non-payment, 35 percent were attributed to nuisance, and eight percent listed no cause. Latinx residents made up 30 percent of the new intakes, Black residents made up 21 percent, 25 percent were from white residents, and 6 percent were Asian Pacific Islander.

Those numbers don’t include tenants who didn’t seek legal help or cases where a landlord has argued that a settlement agreement reached from a previous dispute has been breached, Murphy said. And many of those cases they do know about — about 32 percent — occur in supportive housing.

Landlord representatives argued the Judicial Council rules prevented them from keeping tenants safe.

“What we need is the ability to move out tenants who have created a hostile environment for the other tenants,” said Debra Carleton, executive vice president of state public affairs at the California Apartment Association. “This has truly not been possible under [the council rules].”

State action notwithstanding, San Francisco tenants able to remain in their homes are protected by a local permanent eviction ban. Nonpayment of rent during the emergeny due to coronavirus won’t ever be grounds for the landlord to evict them, state action notwithstanding.

But the courts will still be overwhelmed with cases without the emergency court rules, which could divert critical resources from the neediest tenants, Murphy said. Though the Judicial Council emergency rules didn’t stop some types of cases from continuing, their revocation spells trouble for their experience in the courts moving forward.

The rules didn’t just prevent evictions from non-payment, but tripled the limit for a trial to 60 days. That gave tenants precious time to seek counsel and lawyers to better prepare the cases.

With more cases, the number of people covered by San Francisco’s right to counsel ordinance could go down, said EDC Director of Litigation and Policy Cary Gold. Murphy also noted that they were bracing for more tenants unable to pay rent due to the expiration of bonus federal unemployment benefits.

“Due to capacity reasons, we can’t help every tenant who just calls in,” Murphy said. “Not only do you have more cases, you’re going to have all the cases moving exponentially quicker. Now our attention is going to have to be diverted from [supportive housing cases.]

“Nobody’s optimistic,” Murphy added.

Bay Area NewsCoronavirusHousing and Homelessnesssan francisco news

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

A statue of Florence Nightingale outside the Laguna Honda Hospital is one of only two statues of women in The City. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
S.F. still falling short of goal to represent women in public art

City still has few streets or public facilities not named after men

Methamphetamines (Sophia Valdes/SF Weekly)
New search launched for meth sobering center site

Pandemic put project on pause but gave health officials time to plan a better facility

Hasti Jafari Jozani quarantines at her brother's San Francisco home after obtaining several clearances to study at San Francisco State University. (Photo courtesy Siavash Jafari Jozani)
Sanctions, visas, and the pandemic: One Iranian student’s bumpy path to SF State

Changing immigration rules and travel restrictions leave some overseas students in limbo

Woody LaBounty, left, and David Gallagher started the Western Neighborhoods Project which has a Balboa Street office housing historical items and comprehensive website dedicated to the history of The City’s West side. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Outside Lands podcast delves in to West side’s quirky past

History buffs Woody LaBounty and David Gallagher have been sharing fun stories about the Richmond and Sunset since 1998

Allison Zilnek and her younger daughter Marlow add Ibram X. Kendi’s “Antiracist Baby” to their Little Free Library in Walnut Creek. (Courtesy of Allison Zilnek)
The hunt for little free libraries is alleviating the pandemic doldrums

By Amelia Williams Bay City News Foundation Some people collect stamps. Some… Continue reading

Most Read