Supreme Court decides against PG&E in restitution case

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that it would not hear arguments from PG&E seeking to bar The City and the state from seeking restitution from the energy giant for allegedly transferring ratepayer monies illegally.

The high court’s decision clears the way for The City and state to seek an estimated $4.6 billion from PG&E in state court, in accordance with the decision by the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in January. That court ruled that the restitution case was appropriate. The U.S. Supreme Court was asked to consider the same matter considered by the 9th Circuit.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera contends that during the energy crisis of 2000-2001, PG&E Corp. illegally transferred ratepayer monies from the utility to the parent company.

“The evidence is clear that in the months before PG&E declared bankruptcy, it reorganized subsidiaries and moved cash in an elaborate corporate shell game to send ratepayers’ dollars into shareholders’ pockets,” Herrera said in a prepared statement. “This is a major victory for ratepayers.”

More than four years ago, Herrera filed a civil action lawsuit against the energy giant. The lawsuit led to a series of legal maneuvers over several years, which culminated in the U.S Supreme Court’s ruling. The highest court’s decision exhausts all of PG&E’s federal appeals.

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Outdoor dining, as seen here at Mama’s on Washington Square in North Beach in September, is expected to resume in San Franisco this week. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF to reopen outdoor dining, personal services

San Francisco will allow outdoor dining and other limited business activity to… Continue reading

Patients line up in their cars to receive a shot at The City’s first mass COVID-19 vaccination site at City College of San Francisco on Friday, Jan. 22, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Legislation would require SF to create a public COVID-19 vaccine plan — fast

San Francisco’s Department of Public Health would have to come up with… Continue reading

Ian Jameson (center) organized a group of tenant rights activists and assembled at the El Monte City Hall to demand that the City Council there pass an eviction moratorium barring all evictions during the coronavirus pandemic on Sunday, March 29, 2020. (Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)
California would extend eviction protections to June 30 under proposal

Legislation released Monday would also subsidize rent for low-income tenants

A statue of Florence Nightingale outside the Laguna Honda Hospital is one of only two statues of women in The City. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
S.F. still falling short of goal to represent women in public art

City has few streets or public facilities not named after men

Comedian and actor Bob Odenkirk is among the dozens of performers in Festpocalypse, streaming this weekend to benefit SF Sketchfest. (Courtesy photo)
Bob Odenkirk joins star-studded Festpocalypse gang

Virtual comedy benefit replaces SF Sketchfest this year

Most Read