Supes seek info to set down new rules for Coit Tower

S.F. Examiner File PhotoPolicy: Prop. B

After a contentious fight over restoration and maintenance policies at Coit Tower in the spring, the Board of Supervisors is getting down to the tricky business of interpreting and implementing a vague policy statement that requires San Francisco to “strictly limit” private events at the landmark and to “prioritize” revenue earned there for its upkeep.

The policy measure — dubbed Proposition B and upheld by 53 percent of voters in June — was floated by neighborhood activists in response to the deteriorating state of the landmark’s 1930s-era labor-inspired murals, plus structural problems at the 210-foot concrete tower.

It was opposed by Recreation and Park Department head Phil Ginsburg, who said restraints on the parks budget could hinder his agency’s ability to take care of open spaces citywide.

On Tuesday, Supervisor John Avalos asked The City’s budget analyst to get a detailed description of expenditures and revenue at the tower, and potentially make recommendations on how to interpret the policy. Board President David Chiu, whose district includes Coit Tower, introduced a resolution last week to “reaffirm the commitment to protect and preserve” the landmark.

Sarah Ballard, a Rec and Park spokeswoman, said much of the financial data had already been released in the run-up to a vote on Prop. B. She estimated the tower earns more than $600,000 annually and that about $200,000 goes back into maintenance, including gardening at the surrounding park on Telegraph Hill.

“That leaves about half a million we use to subsidize programs throughout our system, especially in underserved neighborhoods,” Ballard said.

The department has been engaged in initial contract negotiations and community meetings about recruiting a new concessionaire to sell food and beverages at the tower. Ballard said the preliminary contract offering would require a minimum annual guarantee of $540,000 in revenue and allows for 12 private events per year. The latter irked the measure’s proponents, who said monthly private fundraising events violate voter will and do not keep with the spirit of the “strictly limit” language.

While Ginsburg has said the department’s efforts to fix problems were under way before Prop. B passed, that wasn’t enough for Jon Golinger, leader of the measure’s backers. Golinger said the board’s upcoming action will be the first real step in curing what ails the landmark.

“How much has come in for Coit Tower — and exactly what it has been spent on — has been discussed, but not analyzed in detail,” Golinger said.

dschreiber@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPhil GinsburgPoliticsRecreation and Park Department

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

SF police issue first citation for violating stay at home order to abortion protester

Ronald Konopaski, 86, cited outside Planned Parenthood for allegedly failing to shelter in place

Pier 39 aquarium staff furloughed — but what about the fish?

Aquarium of the Bay raising funds from public to keep up operations during shutdown

Help the San Francisco Examiner, SF Weekly continue our mission of providing free, local news

This week, I was faced with the heartbreaking task of reducing the hours — and therefore the pay — of the very journalists who report, write, edit and photograph that news.

San Francisco police begin issuing citations for failing to shelter in place

Officers to cite businesses, people who fail to heed warnings

Ride-hail drivers left idling by coronavirus shutdown looking for a lift

Bay Area ride-hail drivers are among those who have been hit hardest… Continue reading

Most Read