Supes OK surplus spending, deficit to increase

Next year’s projected deficit has increased by nearly $30 million after the Board of Supervisors approved spending a portion of this budget year’s surplus, according to a city report.

The surplus for the end of this budget year decreased from $126.6 million to $98.41 million and the projected deficit for next year grew from $25.4 million to $54.7 million, according to the Office of the Controller’s nine-month budget report released this month.

The spending proposals have strained relations between Mayor Gavin Newsom and the Board of Supervisors. Newsom, who has to submit a balanced city budget to the board by June 1, has accused board members of playing politics with the fiscal health of The City during an election year.

The Board of Supervisors last week approved Supervisor Chris Daly’s proposal to spend $28 million of this year’s surplus on affordable housing needs, and on Tuesday voted 8-2 to approve spending $5 million of the surplus on The City’s Down Payment Assistance Loan Program, a proposal submitted by Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval.

Not included in the Controller’s report is another Daly proposal to spend $20 million of the surplus on programs related to children, families, seniors and the disabled. Today, the Board of Supervisors Budget Committee votes on that proposal.

“The board’s irresponsible spending is bringing us deeper and deeper into the red,” Newsom spokesman Nathan Ballard said on Monday. It remains unclear whether Newsom will veto the surplus spending proposals.

“There’s enough good news in the current year that the one-time appropriation for affordable housing can easily be accommodated without creating a budget problem,” Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin said on Tuesday.

Peskin, however, suggested that the board may have reached its surplus-spending limit. When asked about Daly’s $20 million proposal, Peskin said, “I have some concerns about that. But we’ll see what happens. It’s getting very close to the June 1 budget submission.”

Daly, however, said that “when it comes to supporting struggling families to promote diversity in San Francisco, there is no time like the present.” He said the Mayor’s Office should support it and “build it in” to Newsom’s budget proposal.

jsabatini@examiner.com


E-mail your city officials:

Mayor: Gavin Newsom

Supervisors: Jake McGoldrick – District 1; Michela Alioto-Pier – District 2; Aaron Peskin – District 3; Ed Jew – District 4; Ross Mirkarimi – District 5; Chris Daly – District 6; Sean Elsbernd – District 7; Bevan Dufty – District 8; Tom Ammiano – District 9; Sophie Maxwell – District 10; Gerardo Sandoval – District 11

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read