(Natasha Dangond/Special to S.F. Examiner file photo)

Supes approve 60-day cap on Airbnb rentals

The Board of Supervisors has apparently grown tired of short-term rental scofflaws after legalizing the industry two years ago. In a 6-to-2 vote, legislation introduced by Board President London Breed was approved, imposing a cap of 60-days on short term rentals.

Breed, along with supervisors Aaron Peskin, John Avalos, Jane Kim, Eric Mar and David Campos, voted in support of it.

Supervisors Katy Tang and Malia Cohen opposed the law. Supervisor Mark Farrell was excused from the vote since he has business interests related to short-term rentals, and supervisors Scott Wiener and Norman Yee were absent.

SEE RELATED: Despite Airbnb overture, SF expected to approve 60-day cap on short-term rentals

It is unclear if when the board votes Nov. 29 on the legislation for a second read how many votes there will be. It would take eight votes to override a mayoral veto and it’s unclear whether Mayor Ed Lee will oppose it.

The vote came despite the fact that Airbnb had seemingly changed it’s tune and reached out to The City Monday saying that it wanted to work collaboratively on a registration system to help with enforcement.

But city officials intimated it was too little too late, not to mention the company, valued at $30 billion, has a pending federal lawsuit filed against The City seeking to overturn a separate regulation adopted by the board earlier this year.

The regulatory scheme is widely acknowledged as not working, with only 1,700 short-term rentals registered with The City as required but an estimate of more than 7,000 hosts alone list properties to rent on Airbnb.

While those listing on Airbnb opposed the 60-day cap, calling it “too extreme,” affordable housing and tenant advocates as well as hotel workers union leaders supported it.

The hard cap is meant to help with enforcement and ensure that it’s not more lucrative to have a unit as a short-term rental as opposed to renting it out to a longer term tenant.

Under the current rules, registered hosts can, without limit, rent out homes as short-term rentals if they remain on-site but only for 90 days annually if they are not present on site as hosts. Some board members have said it was nearly impossible to determine whether someone was living on site.

Those registered with the city as of Tuesday are grandfathered in under the existing rules.

Just Posted

ACLU warns BART panhandling and busking ban is ‘unconstitutional’ — and could lead to lawsuits

Elected BART leaders are considering banning panhandling and busking — playing music… Continue reading

Jeff Adachi’s family disputes finding that public defender died of toxic drug mix

Independent expert concludes manner of death was natural

S.F. mural debate follows students during first week of school

Classes started Monday at George Washington High School, but the fallout of… Continue reading

New Chinatown station to be named for Rose Pak, but opponents vow to keep fighting

Debate over power broker’s legacy exposes deep rifts in Chinese community

City shutting down long-term mental health beds to expand hospital Navigation Center

The City is preparing to close dozens of permanent, residential treatment beds… Continue reading

Most Read