Supervisors eye options for funds

San Francisco youth programs could see an additional $3.25 million due to a healthy bump in property tax revenues, but somesupervisors would like to see those voter-allocated dollars go to other needy programs in future years.

Initially, the new funds — which come from the voter-approvedChildren’s Fund, a mix of property taxes and general-fund dollars for youth programs — includedrevenues for Mayor Gavin Newsom’s plan to spend $1.5 million on bank accounts for babies born in San Francisco and $375,000 on vouchers for sixth-graders to visit museums.

Supervisors overturned those ideas last week and suggested new directions for the money — directions that will be finalized by the Department of Children, Youth and FamiliesCitizens Advisory Committee tonight.

Those directions could include $1 million for new intensive foster care for 25 youths with severe mental illness, $800,000 to expand job programs for at-risk youth and $490,000 for youth programsat the Ella Hill Hutch Community Center in the Western Addition, DCYF director Margaret Brodkin said.

Although Newsom’s proposals have been tabled for the time being, Newsom spokesman Nathan Ballard called the supervisors’ decision to kill them “shortsighted” and said the mayor will find a way to fund both initiatives.

Supervisor Sean Elsbernd criticized voter-mandated conditions that led the Children’s Fund to have a surplus when other city departments are cutting back.

“As the Children’s Fund grows, it’s almost as if we are coming up with random ideas to spend this money,” Elsbernd said during budget hearings last week. “The Children’s Fund needs to change.”

After a spending plan for the new money is finalized, it will go to the Board of Supervisors Government and Audit Oversight Committee on Monday.

bwinegarner@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Advocates with the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition hold a rally outside City Hall before the Board of Supervisors were to vote on a resolution supporting the creation of a public banking charter on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Should San Francisco run its own public bank? The debate returns

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Courtesy Anne Wernikoff/CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

People fish at a dock at Islais Creek Park on Thursday, June 10, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What Islais Creek tells us about rising sea levels in San Francisco

Islais Creek is an unassuming waterway along San Francisco’s eastern industrial shoreline,… Continue reading

Organizer Jas Florentino, left, explains the figures which represent 350 kidnapped Africans first sold as slaves in the United States in 1619 in sculptor Dana King’s “Monumental Reckoning.” The installation is in the space of the former Francis Scott Key monument in Golden Gate Park. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What a reparations program would look like in The City

‘If there’s any place we can do it, it’s San Francisco’

Most Read