Evan Ducharme/Special to The S.F. ExaminerSupervisor London Breed wants to make taggers liable for the cost of cleaning up graffiti like this piece on 24th Street.

Evan Ducharme/Special to The S.F. ExaminerSupervisor London Breed wants to make taggers liable for the cost of cleaning up graffiti like this piece on 24th Street.

Supervisor London Breed seeks graffiti law to hit taggers’ wallets

San Francisco’s graffiti abatement services cost city departments and property owners an estimated $20 million a year, but a new proposal may start forcing taggers to pay up.

Property owners currently must remove graffiti within 30 days or face penalties. Likewise, city departments are expected to remove graffiti from city property promptly. Abating the graffiti vandalism has been a constant headache, some say, as nothing seems to stop the taggers.

But Supervisor London Breed may have the answer. She announced last week that she is working on legislation to allow the Department of Public Works and Recreation and Park Department to pursue civil suits against repeat graffiti offenders.

The legislation, she said, would be modeled after “a successful program in San Diego” and would take the enforcement out of the hands of criminal prosecutors who generally focus on more serious offenses. Under Breed’s proposal, the city attorney would be authorized to file civil lawsuits against repeat offenders and recover costs for the damage.

“We know that low-level crimes are rarely being prosecuted in this city,” Breed said. In fiscal year 2012-13, there were 201 graffiti crime arrests.

According to the most recent data from the Graffiti Advisory Board, in August there were 779 reports of graffiti on public property in The City, compared with 1,016 reports in August 2012. Reports of graffiti on private property were also down. There were 474 incidents in August and 519 in August 2012. But the calls alone do not reflect the full extent of the incidents. In August, Public Works issued 1,100 notices to private property owners about graffiti violations, which jumped from 832 the previous year.

The most popular neighborhoods for taggers have been Districts 3, 6 and 9, which include North Beach, the Tenderloin, South of Market and the Mission. There were 297 notices of violations issued for District 9 property owners alone in August.

Breed announced the legislation during last week’s 6-5 vote on closing parks between midnight and 5 a.m. She suggested proposals such as hers would better address the graffiti challenge in public parks “without unduly impacting those who have nothing to do with those offenses.” The board will take a second and final vote on the park closure legislation, introduced by Supervisor Scott Wiener, next week.Bay Area NewsGovernment & Politicsgraffiti removalpark closuresPoliticsSupervisor London Breed

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco lacks housing data that would let it track rental vacancies and prices. New legislation is seeking to change that.<ins> (Photo by Joel Angel Jurez/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Landlords blast proposal to require annual report on rentals as invasion of privacy

Housing inventory could give city better data on housing vacancies, affordability

Health care workers would be the first group in the state to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. (Go Nakamura/Getty Images/TNS)
Hope on the way: Here’s what to know about California’s COVID-19 vaccine plan

The first batch of doses could hit the state as soon as early December

The Big Game was played Friday at Memorial Stadium in Berkeley. (Shutterstock)
Stanford blocks extra point to stun Cal, win 123rd Big Game 24-23

The 123rd edition of the Big Game featured a number of firsts.… Continue reading

Psilocybin magic mushrooms (Shutterstock)
‘Magic mushrooms’ moving into the mainstream

Efforts to decriminalize psychedelics could follow several different paths

The 2020 Census has concluded taking responses sooner than expected. (Courtesy photo)
What does California have to lose if undocumented immigrants are excluded from the census?

By Kim Bojórquez The Sacramento Bee If The U.S. Supreme Court rules… Continue reading

Most Read