Super Bowl City along The Embarcadero was spread throughout Justin Herman Plaza and Sue Bierman Park. (Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Super Bowl 50 costs more than expected, but reportedly made SF money

Four months after hosting Super Bowl 50 — an event that stirred controversy for its impacts to homeless residents, vendors and small businesses — a report released Monday shows the event cost $9.6 million in city services, more than double the initial estimate.

But since Super Bowl 50 generated $11.6 million, The City came out in the black by $2 million, according to the City Controller cost impact report.

The report’s results, however, are about as contested as a controversial game-day call.

Mayor Ed Lee and Supervisor Mark Farrell, the loudest cheerleaders of hosting the event, released separate statements hailing it as an economic success. The cost impact was more than double what the Mayor’s Office estimated in early January amid criticism of the deal.

Those critical of the deal remained just as critical following the release of the report.

In an interview San Francisco Examiner, Supervisors Jane Kim and Aaron Peskin explained why they thought The City got a bad deal — despite the report’s findings.

“If you read the fine print, The City didn’t make $1.9 million. It arguably barely broke even or lost money,” Peskin said.

He said the report failed to include $500,000 incurred to speed up construction by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority because it’s not a city agency, for example. The report also doesn’t factor in city projects “sped up” for the event like Wi-Fi service on Market Street, or volunteer hours.

Notably, the report also doesn’t include the impact of shifting resources toward the event if an additional expense wasn’t occurred. Critics argue this meant other areas of the The City had services diminished. The report also doesn’t address the impacts on businesses who lost revenue.

“The controller is, with all due respect, working hard to come up with the rosiest projections,” Peskin said, adding that “these are not the vaunted rosy projections that Super Bowl boosters” promised.

But Mayor Ed Lee had a different take. “Hosting Super Bowl 50 exceeded our expectations, and I look forward to the Host Committee’s Economic Impact Report that will show how the event benefitted our workers, our small businesses and our greater regional economy,” the mayor’s statement said.

Farrell’s statement took aim at critics like Peskin. “During the lead-up to the big game, many criticized The City’s costs for hosting Super Bowl 50, and now those criticisms should hopefully be put to bed where they belong. I know that the Super Bowl 50 festivities caused some inconveniences for our residents, but this report proves once and for all that San Francisco was made whole and then some.”

Supervisor Jane Kim said regardless of revenue, it was simply bad policy to provide public subsidies for a $13 billion corporation.

“If you ask the average resident, if all the the inconveniences were worth it, if the $2 million in revenue was worth it, I think most San Franciscans would say no,” Kim said.

The SB 50 Host Committee estimates 1.1 million fans attended the weeklong celebration at Super Bowl City set up at Justin Herman Plaza, and the NFL Fan Experience at Moscone Convention Center in a lead up to the Super Bowl, which was held Feb. 7 at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara. Board of SupervisorsfootballNFLPoliticsSan FranciscoSuper Bowl 50Super Bowl City

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

The City requires the recycling or reuse of debris material removed from a construction project site. <ins>(Emma Chiang/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Permits proposed for haulers of construction debris to achieve zero-waste

San Francisco plans to tighten regulations on the disposal of construction and… Continue reading

(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/TNS)
Newsom says California will review FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines before releasing to public

By Taryn Luna Los Angeles Times California will review the safety of… Continue reading

Rachael Tanner, left, testifies virtually before the Board of Supervisors Rules Committee Monday, October 19, 2020. (SFGOV courtesy art)
Rachael Tanner set to become SF’s next Planning Commissioner

Rachael Tanner is expected to serve as the newest member of the… Continue reading

People exercise along the closed Great Highway on Friday, Oct. 2, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Could the Great Highway become a great city park?

Permanent closure would require extensive public outreach, safety and traffic management plans

Flames and smoke overtake a tree as the LNU Lightning Complex fire spreads in Fairfield, California on August 19, 2020. (JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)
Many wildfires near full containment, but officials fear continuing hot weather

By Molly Burke The Sacramento Bee Thousands of firefighters continue to battle… Continue reading

Most Read