State's top court says doctors must treat gays

Doctors do not have a religious-freedom right to refuse treatment to a patient because of sexual orientation, the California Supreme Court ruled today.

In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that a Southern California fertility clinic could not deny a lesbian couple artificial insemination services if its doctors refused to perform the procedure on religious grounds based on the couple's sexual orientation.

Guadalupe Benitez, a resident of Oceanside, north of San Diego, sued the North Coast Women's Medical Group and two of its doctors for refusing to give her fertility treatments in 2000.

Benitez, now 36, contended that the physicians objected to treating a lesbian patient because of their Christian beliefs.

The doctors claimed that their religious beliefs precluded them from performing the procedure on any unmarried woman, and not because of Benitez's sexual orientation.

Benitez eventually went to doctors outside her insurance plan and she and her partner became the parents of a 6-year-old boy and 2-year-old twins. But she claimed the first two doctors' refusal to provide artificial insemination caused her emotional distress and cost her thousands of extra dollars.

The court said today that clinics could ensure “full and equal” access by assigning the procedure to another clinic physician who did not have the same religious objections.

In a statement issued after the ruling, Benitez's lawyer Jennifer Pizer said, “There's a great diversity of religious beliefs in California, and they're all protected – but not to the point where laws are violated and other people are hurt.”

“Each of us is protected both in our religious beliefs and also from religiously based discrimination in the doctor's office and other commercial settings,” she said.

A lawyer for the clinic and the doctors was not immediately available for comment. Bay City News

Bay Area NewscourtsGay marriageLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

U.S. Attorney David Anderson announces federal firearms charges against two men for their roles in a March 2019 shooting outside the Fillmore Heritage Center in a news conference alongside SFPD staff at the Phillip Burton Federal Building on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Departing U.S. attorney predicts corruption probe will continue

David Anderson shook up City Hall as top federal prosecutor

Board of Supervisors President Shamann Walton, a former school board member, has been asked to help secure an agreement between the school district and teacher’s union. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
 <ins></ins>
Supervisor Walton tapped to mediate teacher contract talks

District and union at odds over hours in-person students should be in the classroom

California is set to receive supplies of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which is still under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Courtesy photo)
California could receive 380K doses of new J&J COVID vaccine next week

California could receive 380,300 doses of the new Johnson & Johnson vaccine… Continue reading

Disability advocates protested outside the home of San Francisco Health Officer Tomas Aragon. (Courtesy Brooke Anderson)
Vaccine rollout plan for people with disabilities remains deeply flawed

On February 13, disability activists paid a visit to the house of… Continue reading

A Bay Area Concrete Recycling facility that opened on PG&E property in 2019. Former PG&E employees have been accused of accepting bribes from Bay Area Concrete. (Courtesy of Bay Area Concrete Recycling via ProPublica)
Lawsuit reveals new allegations against PG&E contractor accused of fraud

By Scott Morris Bay City News Foundation Utility giant Pacific Gas &… Continue reading

Most Read