(Ekevara Kitpowsong/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)

(Ekevara Kitpowsong/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)

State to weigh possible fingerprint criminal checks for Uber, Lyft drivers

State regulators kicked off “phase three” for creating new regulations for Uber, Lyft and other ride-hail companies in California this month.

The focus of Phase III of the California Public Utilities Commission’s ride-hail proceedings are whether or not California should require fingerprints and criminal background checks for drivers.

That question may be resolved by late 2018, CPUC Commissioner Liane Randolph wrote in a state filing this month.

Right now, Uber and Lyft use third-party criminal background checks to process their drivers, which are based on Social Security numbers and publicly available information. The ride-hail giants wrote in previous state filings that the third-party checks strike a balance between preserving public safety, affordability and quickness.

But the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, the San Francisco International Airport and other statewide entities argued in counter-filings that Uber’s and Lyft’s criminal checks are easily fooled by simple tricks, like using a seldom-used middle name.

The criminal background check Uber used, San Francisco officials argued in previous filings, allowed approved drivers with histories of murder, sex offenses, kidnapping, assault, robbery, burglary, fraud, identity theft, reckless driving and driving under the influence.

The process for crafting the regulations launched in April with the commission asking various government bodies and private entities a multitude of legal questions, including, “Does subjecting all [ride-hail] drivers to a biometric background check adversely affect the chances of persons of different races or ethnicities to pass the background checking process?”

That has long been the assertion of Uber, who asserted in multiple legal filings with the state that more strict requirements for criminal background checks would disenfranchise minorities, who are in turn allegedly disenfranchised by the criminal justice system. Transit

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Construction in the Better Market Street Project between Fifth and Eighth streets is expected to break ground in mid-2021.<ins></ins>
SFMTA board to vote on Better Market Street changes

Agency seeks to make up for slimmed-down plan with traffic safety improvements

Golden State Warriors point guard Stephen Currey (30) tallied 26 points and seven assists at Monday night’s game against the Lakers. (Chris Victorio for the S.F. Examiner).
Warriors overcome 19-point deficit to stun defending-champion Lakers 115-113

Ladies and gentlemen, the Golden State Warriors are officially back. Stephen Curry… Continue reading

U.S. Vice President-elect Kamala Harris speaks during an event to name President-elect Joe Biden’s economic team at the Queen Theater on Dec. 1, 2020, in Wilmington, Del. (Alex Wong/Getty Images/TNS)
Kamala Harris to resign from Senate

Bridget Bowman CQ-Roll Call Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will resign from the… Continue reading

A view of Science Hall at the City College of San Francisco Ocean campus on Thursday, Jan. 14, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
CCSF begins search for next chancellor amid new challenges

‘It’s arguably the biggest single responsibility the board has,’ trustee says

Some people are concerned that University of California, San Francisco’s expansion at its Parnassus campus could cause an undesirable increase in the number of riders on Muni’s N-Judah line.<ins></ins>
Will UCSF’s $20 million pledge to SFMTA offset traffic woes?

An even more crowded N-Judah plus increased congestion ahead cause concern

Most Read