(Cindy Chew/2006 S.F. Examiner)

(Cindy Chew/2006 S.F. Examiner)

SF wants less car-friendly development amid population, construction boom

In San Francisco, where there is a registered car for about every two residents, city officials plan to bolster its transit-first policy by requiring new construction to add amenities that make walking, riding Muni or bicycling more appealing.

But the proposal, officially called the Transportation Demand Management Program, hit a roadblock during Monday’s Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee hearing as a number of different groups called for amendments to the current plan.

The goal is to reduce car trips from new development sites to reduce congestion and improve the environment and roadway safety.

Carli Paine, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s transportation manager, said the program is “a change in how new development shapes transportation choices for site users to reduce the need to drive.” She added, “On-site parking is the most powerful determiner of whether someone chooses to drive or not.”

Walk SF, an organization advocating walking, as well as health services nonprofits and the Residential Builders Association, a local construction association of smaller residential projects, were among those critical of the current proposal.

Each sought specific changes. Health nonprofits wanted an exemption, for example, and Walk SF wanted a greater emphasis on walking. Nonprofit housing developers wanted a more nuanced requirement tied to the amount of affordable units on site.

Under the proposed program, which was introduced by Supervisor John Avalos and approved by the Planning Commission, developers must submit plans to reduce vehicle trips by incorporating a host of measures that are based on a scoring system.

Each project would need to achieve certain points based on the number of parking spaces. On the lower point scale, measures include things like showers and lockers. The higher scale includes transit subsidies and reduced parking spaces. An on-site grocery store would also earn points.

The requirement would apply to residential developments of 10 or more housing units or other developments, such as office or retail space, in excess of 10,000 square feet. There is an exemption for 100 percent affordable housing projects.

Transportation demand management plans would cost at least $6,000 and periodic compliance review fees at $1,000 to continue to ensure proactive compliance with the requirements.

Cheryl Brinkman, vice-chair of the SFMTA Board of Directors, said by adopting the program San Francisco “would once again be a model city for the rest of the nation and be a laboratory for new ideas.”

She added, “It is possible to grow smartly. We are on that path. This is a key step.”

There were also concerns about the grandfathering provisions.

Avalos initially proposed the program would go into effect once the law was adopted, but that was amended Monday by Supervisor Malia Cohen. Per the amendment, developments with applications submitted before Sept. 4 would have to meet 50 percent of the of requirement, and for developments applications submitted between Sept. 5 and Jan 1, 2018, 75 percent.

San Francisco’s transit-first policy is enshrined in The City’s charter and states that public transit must be an “economically and environmentally sound alternative to transportation by individual automobiles,” and that “travel by public transit, by bicycle and on foot must be an attractive alternative to travel by private automobile.”

The Department of Environment said recently there are 425,000 registered cars in San Francisco. Total vehicle traveling on the streets represents 40 percent of The City’s greenhouse gas emissions.

“We are not going to be able to pass this measure until after I am out of office,” said Avalos, who is termed out of office at the end of the year. He noted, “The concept that’s here before us today is a sound one.”Transit

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police Officer Nicholas Buckley, pictured here in 2014, is now working out of Bayview Station. <ins>(Department of Police Accountability records)</ins>
SF police return officer to patrol despite false testimony

A San Francisco police officer accused of fabricating a reason for arresting… Continue reading

Riordan Crusaders versus St. Ignatius Wildcats at JB Murphy Field on the St. Ignatius Prepatory High School Campus on September 14, 2019 in San Francisco, California. (Chris Victorio | Special to the S.F. Examiner)
State allows high school sports to resume, but fight is far from over

For the first time since mid-March 2020, there is hope for high… Continue reading

A nurse draws up a dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at the Mission neighborhood COVID-19 vaccine site on Monday, Feb. 1, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF expands vaccine eligiblity, but appointments ‘limited’

San Francisco expanded eligibility for COVID-19 vaccinations Wednesday but appointments remain limited… Continue reading

The now-shuttered Cliff House restaurant overlooks Ocean Beach people at Ocean Beach on Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021. (Sebastian Miño-Bucheli / Special to the S.F. Examiner)
History buffs working to keep Cliff House collection in public view

Funds needed to buy up historic building’s contents at auction

Perceived supply and demand in the Bay Area’s expensive rental market can play a big part in determining what people pay. (Shutterstock)
Bay Area rental market is rebounding — but why?

Hearing about people leaving town can have as big an effect as actual economic factors

Most Read