SF supervisor’s proposal on surveillance targets police body cameras

John Avalos

John Avalos

Under a proposed ordinance, all San Francisco city departments that use or acquire surveillance equipment — including the Police Department, which is currently working on a policy governing body cameras for officers — would be audited annually and forced to create specific policies guaranteeing civil liberties and privacy.

John Avalos
John Avalos

Supervisor John Avalos’ ordinance would require all departments to have a surveillance data policy within a year, and it would also require an annual audit to monitor how well they are following that policy.

Body-mounted cameras for police would be subject to the new rules.

“Legally enforceable safeguards must be in place to protect civil liberties and civil rights before any surveillance technology is deployed,” according to the ordinance.

Upon introducing the ordinance at the Board of Supervisors last week, Avalos said it would provide some transparency in the use of surveillance technology.

“The City needs to be proactive in making sure there’s public oversight of how these technologies are used,” Avalos said last week. While Some of these technologies provide public benefit, “we need to create a public process for reviewing them and approving them, as well as implementing policies about how they’re regulated.”

Police Commission President Suzy Loftus, who will be among the commissioners who decide on the final body camera policies for the Police Department, said she could not comment on any impacts Avalos’ proposal would have on police body cameras because she was not familiar with the ordinance’s language.

Mayor Ed Lee’s proposed budget includes $6 million to equip all 1,700 sworn police staff with body cameras. The Police Commission on May 6 gave the department three months to finalize a policy for the cameras.

Avalos asked board President London Breed to fast-track the ordinance so supervisors can be consider while they review the mayor’s budget proposal for body camera funds. San Francisco’s budget must be finalized by June 30.

Last November, Avalos asked the City Attorney’s Office to draft legislation to create a surveillance accountability ordinance. As part of that request he shared the American Civil Liberties Union model with the city attorney and other departments. Since then his office has worked with the city attorney to integrate the surveillance oversight process into San Francisco’s budget process.

The ordinance would require the Board of Supervisors to approve a surveillance data policy before any department seeks funding or grants for surveillance technologies. It would also require city departments to submit annual reports on the uses of surveillance technologies.Body CamerasCrimeJohn Avalospolice camerasSan Francisco Policesurveillance oversight

Just Posted

Pregnant women are in the high-risk category currently prioritized for booster shots in San Francisco. (Unai Huizi/Shutterstock)
What pregnant women need to know about COVID and booster shots

Inoculations for immunosuppressed individuals are recommended in the second trimester

Examiner reporter Ben Schneider drives an Arcimoto Fun Utility Vehicle along Beach Street in Fisherman’s Wharf on Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Could San Francisco’s tiny tourist cruisers become the cars of the future?

‘Fun Utility Vehicles’ have arrived in The City

The Science Hall at the City College of San Francisco Ocean campus is pictured on Jan. 14. The Democrats’ Build Back Better bill would enable free community college nationwide, but CCSF is already tuition-free for all San Francisco residents. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What Biden’s Build Back Better bill would mean for San Franciscans

Not much compared to other places — because The City already provides several key features

A directional sign at Google in Mountain View, Calif., on Oct. 20, 2020. Workers at Google and Amazon are demanding their companies pull out of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract to provide cloud services for the Israeli military and government. (Laura Morton/The New York Times)
Google and Amazon employees criticize $1.2 billion cloud services contract with Israel

‘We can create a world in which tech companies can thrive without doing harm’

Most Read