The Port of San Francisco has commissioned a study that will determine what could happen in a major quake to the four miles of northern waterfront stretching from Fisherman’s Wharf to AT&T Park. Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner 2014 file photo

The Port of San Francisco has commissioned a study that will determine what could happen in a major quake to the four miles of northern waterfront stretching from Fisherman’s Wharf to AT&T Park. Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner 2014 file photo

SF Port examining earthquake vulnerability of northern waterfront

It’s no secret San Francisco is due for a major earthquake that will rival the devastating magnitude-7.8 temblor of 1906.

There’s a one in three chance the Hayward fault alone will produce a magnitude-6.7 or larger quake in the next three decades.

The City is preparing for such an event by requiring at an unprecedented level various seismic upgrades and evaluations of residential, commercial and educational buildings. Rebuilding major infrastructure of the Bay Bridge and Doyle Drive to meet seismic safety standards are other major efforts to prepare San Francisco for “the big one.”

But it remains unknown exactly what will happen in a major quake to the four miles of northern waterfront stretching from Fisherman’s Wharf to AT&T Park. That area constitutes the Northern Waterfront Seawall – some of the most valuable land in the world and a gate for thousands of people who enter and leave The City each day.

“In major earthquakes around the world we’ve seen major damage along the waterfronts,” said Steven Reel, a project manager for the Port of San Francisco. “The waterfront [in San Francisco] is built on filled land that’s historically not performed very well.”

That’s why the Port commissioned a $425,000 consultant-led study earlier this year to explore how the Northern Waterfront Seawall – composed of more than 40 different combinations of rock dike, bulkhead wall and bulkhead wharf – would fare in an earthquake.

The study is expected to be complete early next year, though an informational update was presented at a Port Commission meeting Tuesday, less than a week before the 26th anniversary of the Loma Prieta earthquake on Saturday.

“The results of this study will help inform what we can do to improve things but also tie in together with the response to sea level rise and may set the framework for the overall [waterfront] planning,” Reel said.

But what’s unique about the effort is that for the first time the Port is examining the resiliency of the waterfront during an earthquake combined with impending sea level rise and climate change —  both factors that are also expected to impact the waterfront in the coming decades.

“The earthquake vulnerabilities and mitigation measures, if there are any that are recommended, will really tie into the response to sea level rise,” Reel said.

San Francisco Bay waters are projected to rise as much as 6 feet by 2100, and as much as $5 billion may be needed within the next two decades to rebuild the wall that has been San Francisco’s waterfront for the past century, the San Francisco Examiner previously reported.

Tackling such needs along with the results of the earthquake vulnerability study will allow the Port to plan better for waterfront needs in the coming years, said Reel.

“Before 2050 there’s a very good chance we’re going to have one or more major earthquakes. That’s going to be something The City hasn’t seen since 1906,” he noted. “If we find that that type of earthquake is going to cause significant damage to the waterfront and that it is very costly to mitigate that kind of damage, it’s going to tie in with [our] response to sea level rise.”Planning

Just Posted

It’s not uncommon to find a plastic tampon applicator washed up on the beach. (Courtesy Eva Holman)
The environmental toll of disposable feminine products

Uninhibited feedback by cisgender women is key

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. PHOTO COURTESY SALESFORCE
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins says that she and other members of San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education facing potential recall “represent constituents that are often erased or talked over.” <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Is the Black Cat incident a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor London Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20?<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)</ins>
Club owners to maskless mayor: Are we the new fun police?

Black Cat affair highlights difficult recovery for nightlife industry

Most Read