The main entrance of the San Francisco Police Officers Association office. (Jessica Christian/2016 S.F. Examiner)

The main entrance of the San Francisco Police Officers Association office. (Jessica Christian/2016 S.F. Examiner)

SF police union to make last push for Taser ballot measure

The San Francisco police union is fighting to the finish line for a ballot measure that would create a new policy for the use of stun guns despite wide-ranging opposition from City Hall and civil liberties activists.

San Francisco Police Officers Association President Tony Montoya on Tuesday called for at least 100 officers to hand out literature in favor of Proposition H in the Union Street area and in the Sunset and Richmond districts over the weekend.

“It was very apparent from our recent contract negotiations that some at City Hall simply do not respect police officers in this city,” Montoya wrote in a letter to union members. “We need to fight for ourselves.”

The union began gathering signatures to place the measure on the ballot before the Police Commission passed a policy for the use of Tasers in March.

Police officials plan to roll out Tasers by the end of the year regardless of the ballot measure. The measure is not about arming officers with Tasers, but overriding the Police Commission policy with less-restrictive rules for their use.

Montoya urged officers to display a “show of force” for the measure because he said the Police Commission policy would restrict the use of stun guns “to the point where our officers will be hesitant to even utilize them.”

“The policy will also give the police department and the Police Commission wide discretion to discipline you, and the ability to second guess you every time you utilize this less than lethal option,” Montoya told the officers.

Montoya described the commission’s Taser policy as restrictive “with language that appears in no other city in America when regarding an officers ability to use or not use the device.”

But Police Commissioner Petra DeJesus said that is simply not the case.

“Proposition H’s path to the ballot is peppered with lies and omissions,” DeJesus said in a text message. “I trust the San Francisco voters can see through this duplicity and turn down this dangerous policy.”

The Police Commission policy requires an “immediate physical threat” before an officer can use a Taser. DeJesus said the San Jose Police Department has used the same language in its policy since 2010.

“The union prefers that officers can tase at will, even when the officer is not facing any immediate threat,” DeJesus said.

Montoya did not respond to a request for an interview.

The union has largely gone to bat for the measure on its own despite having the endorsements of politicians including state Sen. Scott Wiener, Supervisor Jeff Sheehy and former Supervisor Angela Alioto, a candidate for mayor.

Mayor Mark Farrell, an ardent police supporter who shared a political consultant with the union before becoming mayor, withdrew his backing for the measure after the Police Commission approved its policy. Police Chief Bill Scott and most members of the Board of Supervisors have come out against the measure.

The union has supplied the vast majority of the more than $439,000 contributed to the Prop. H campaign as of Thursday, contributing $348,459 directly and $51,112 through the SFPOA Issues Political Action Committee.

Campaign finance records also show that contributions include $10,000 each from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 6, Northern California Carpenters Regional Issues PAC and the San Francisco Laborers Local 261, as well as $1,000 from San Francisco socialite Dede Wilsey.

Meanwhile, opponents have ramped up their efforts to defeat the measure with more than $85,000 contributed to the campaign against Prop. H, which is largely funded by the ACLU of Northern California.

mbarba@sfexaminer.com CrimePolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Advocates with the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition hold a rally outside City Hall before the Board of Supervisors were to vote on a resolution supporting the creation of a public banking charter on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Should San Francisco run its own public bank? The debate returns

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Photo by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

People fish at a dock at Islais Creek Park on Thursday, June 10, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What Islais Creek tells us about rising sea levels in San Francisco

Islais Creek is an unassuming waterway along San Francisco’s eastern industrial shoreline,… Continue reading

Organizer Jas Florentino, left, explains the figures which represent 350 kidnapped Africans first sold as slaves in the United States in 1619 in sculptor Dana King’s “Monumental Reckoning.” The installation is in the space of the former Francis Scott Key monument in Golden Gate Park. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What a reparations program would look like in The City

‘If there’s any place we can do it, it’s San Francisco’

Officer Joel Babbs, pictured at a protest outside the Hall of Justice in 2017, is representing himself in an unusually public police misconduct matter. <ins>(Courtesy Bay City News)</ins>
The strange and troubling story of Joel Babbs: What it tells us about the SFPD

The bizarre and troubling career of a whistle-blowing San Francisco police officer… Continue reading

Most Read