John Becker, 30, of Silver Spring, Md., waves a rainbow flag in support of gay marriage outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, Thursday June 25, 2015. The same-sex marriage ruling is among the remaining to be released before the term ends at the end of June. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP photo)

John Becker, 30, of Silver Spring, Md., waves a rainbow flag in support of gay marriage outside of the Supreme Court in Washington, Thursday June 25, 2015. The same-sex marriage ruling is among the remaining to be released before the term ends at the end of June. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP photo)

SF awaits Supreme Court decision on gay marriage

It’s deja vu for LGBT San Franciscans, and their allies.

Once again, a momentous United States Supreme Court decision is due on gay marriage.

Once again, the decision is slated for the last few days in the Supreme Court’s calendar (and just before the Pride parade).

And once again, the decision could catapult marriage rights forward in the United States, or severely curtail them.

“We’ve been here before,” said Supervisor Scott Wiener, an out politician who represents the Castro district. The tension mirrors the time just before the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn California’s Proposition 8, the same-sex marriage ban.

The feeling, Wiener said, is like “having butterflies in your stomach every morning when you wake up. You look at the clock, it’s 6:30 or 7:15 and just waiting for the court to make an announcement.”

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on Obergefell v. Hodges on Friday, Monday, or perhaps during an extension of the court’s calendar to Tuesday. The case considers if the 14th Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex.

Secondarily, the court will also consider if the 14th Amendment requires a state to recognize a marriage between two same-sex people from another state, where the marriage is legal.

That makes for three possible outcomes, which the LGBT community is largely viewing as the best, middle, and worst, in that order.

One possibility is states will be required to legally license same sex marriages, and recognize out-of-state marriages. If this sweeping ruling is made, “marriage equality will finally become law of the land in all 50 states,” according to advocacy group Human Rights Campaign.

Another possibility is the states may not legally be required to license same sex marriages, but still must recognize such marriages from out of state. This would leave the choice of same-sex marriage up to state-by-state decisions.

Finally, an outcome most advocates consider damaging to the LGBT movement would have states essentially silo themselves off – state same-sex marriage bans would not only be preserved, but states would not be legally required to recognize same-sex marriage licenses from other states.

Local drag performer Juanita MORE! counts herself among those waiting on the edge of her seat, mostly because she’s afraid of how the decision may effect the life of her brother, Frank Capley-Alfano.

“My little brother has been married to his partner for 15 years,” MORE! wrote the San Francisco Examiner. “We have been checking in with each other every morning to see if the decision has been made!”

Former-Mayor Gaving Newsom, who set off the same-sex marriage firestorm by marrying same-sex couples in City Hall, also counts himself among those eagerly awaiting the decision.

“In 2004, the year we started to marry same-sex couples in San Francisco, it was impossible to imagine that this day might come so quickly,” he wrote in a statement.

Many credit Newsom’s act of marrying same-sex couples with sparking a movement that continues on to this day. Right now, 36 states allow same-sex marriage. On Friday, many eyes will be glued to, which will report live on a possible supreme court decision.

“We expect one or more opinions on Friday at 10:00 a.m. We will begin live-blogging at 9:00 a.m.,” the blog wrote, a sentence putting some San Franciscans on pins and needles.

Supervisor Wiener is optimistic the supreme court will make a ruling that benefits the LGBT community.

“We’ve been fortunate with the Supreme Court in the last 20 years, that every time the issue of LGBT rights has gone to the court we’ve won,” he said. “I’m an optimist, and I think the court set a clear trajectory here. The next logical step is for the court to strike down these anti-marriage laws.

Still, he said, waiting is hard. “It certainly is nerve wracking.”Gay marriageLGBTscoutsSupervisor Scott WienerSupreme Court

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

A view of Science Hall at the City College of San Francisco Ocean campus on Thursday, Jan. 14, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
CCSF begins search for next chancellor amid new challenges

‘It’s arguably the biggest single responsibility the board has,’ trustee says

Some people are concerned that University of California, San Francisco’s expansion at its Parnassus campus could cause an undesirable increase in the number of riders on Muni’s N-Judah line.<ins></ins>
Will UCSF’s $20 million pledge to SFMTA offset traffic woes?

An even more crowded N-Judah plus increased congestion ahead cause concern

From left, Natasha Dennerstein, Gar McVey-Russell, Lucy Jane Bledsoe, Jan Steckel and Miah Jeffra appear in Perfectly Queer’s fifth anniversary reading on Jan. 20.<ins> (Courtesy photo)</ins>
Perfectly Queer reading series celebrates fifth anniversary

Online event features five writers, games, prizes

(Robert Greene/Tribune News Service)
As tensions grow over vaccinations and politics, California lawmakers face threats from public

Anti-vaccine speakers hint at gun violence during routine budget hearing at state Capitol

Dr. Martin Luther King in Sam Pollard’s ‘MLK/FBI’. (Courtesy of IFC Films/TNS)
The superb documentary ‘MLK/FBI’ clearly connects the past to our troubling present

Justin Chang Los Angeles Times Among the many archival materials excerpted in… Continue reading

Most Read