Lowell High School is known for its academically competitive, high pressure environment.<ins></ins>

Lowell High School is known for its academically competitive, high pressure environment.

School board aims to change Lowell’s culture, end selective admissions

After decades of Black and Latino students decrying what has been described as a “racist culture” at Lowell High School, a proposal to address those concerns that could spell the end of the school’s selective admissions policy debuted at the school board on Tuesday.

The resolution seeking an equity review, action plan and change in policies comes after anti-Black and anti-Semitic slurs and images flooded an anti-racist lesson last month. Notably, the proposal also seeks to end Lowell’s selective admissions policy, which is described as “out of compliance with state law.”

“A lot of our culture is formed from admissions,” said Shavonne Hines-Foster, a Lowell senior and Black Student Union leader on the board. “I don’t think our school has made significant changes where they deserve to keep admissions. We’re in the same place we’ve been for years.”

Lowell is the San Francisco Unified School District’s only school that admits students based on academics and has long been majority Asian and white students with Black and Latino students in the minority, in numbers disproportionate to the district’s demographics.

To great backlash, the school board temporarily moved Lowell to the regular lottery admissions system this year due to lack of letter grades under the pandemic in October and indicated a permanent fix was needed.

A number of speakers at Tuesday’s meeting agreed change was needed to tackle racism but were concerned about not having enough time to solicit feedback — a sentiment that Board member Jenny Lam echoed in remarks to The Examiner. Others sought to keep the admissions policy intact, while a math teacher outright denied witnessing any racism at the school.

“I have never practiced or observed racism in the Lowell population,” said Jeremy Gribler. “We have to do better for all minorities in San Francisco. However, to make Lowell a scapegoat for isolated, racially motivated incidents and shut down its unique academic structure as retaliation, it’s not the right approach.”

Many, including alumni from decades ago, have pointed to the admissions policy as a major cause for experiences of racism and isolation. Superintendent Vincent Matthews himself recounted last week that he refused to attend the school after gaining admission as a teen, knowing the culture that awaited.

“In San Francisco, I always felt that we were a very open, liberal city where I never really experienced racism just right in my face,” said acting Capt. Yulanda Williams, a Lowell alumni and president of Officers for Justice. “It wasn’t really until I got to Lowell High School that I was faced with what I read about, heard about, some things my parents had experienced in Louisiana. They came to California to get away from the racism.”

But far more needs to be done than address the student body makeup and feelings of superiority that may come with selective admissions, as the resolution by Board Vice President Alison Collins, President Gabriela Lopez and Board member Matt Alexander outlines.

“Anyone who says these decisions are ‘rushed’ clearly hasn’t been paying attention to the relationship between the admissions policy and discrimination we’ve [seen] over the last several decades,” Collins told The Examiner. “The admissions policy alone won’t entirely fix the problems with racist abuse and discrimination at the school. But it is clearly a key contributor.”

Should the resolution pass, SFUSD would undergo an equity audit that would review demands made by Black students during a 2016 walkout and create an action plan with results published by the end of the current school year. It would also review district-wide policies around harassment, anti-racist curriculum, equitable distribution of extracurricular activities, and systems for reporting racist abuse and sexual harassment.

SFUSD would partner with the Human Rights Commission’s Office of Racial Equity and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and its state and city chapters to form a community coalition. Black student union leaders, African American Parent Advisory Council, San Francisco Alliance of Black School Educators and others would inform work to be done on Lowell with outside funding.

“Our students are not safe, they’re under mental duress at Lowell,” said Virginia Marshall, president of SFABSE. “It just breaks the students’ spirit. The desire is here to transform the school. We have to stop this culture that ‘I’m better than you.’”

The community coalition would report to the school board by September.

Alexander noted that reforming Lowell under a community process would likely be a process taking months or years.

“Even if we change the admissions policy, Lowell can still be a school of excellence, Alexander said. “The question is, what will that look like? In some ways, Lowell needs to find its identity as an anti-racist school of excellence and that’s not going to happen overnight. That’s a conversation we need to hear from all people who care about Lowell.”

The school board first planned to vote on the resolution next Tuesday but will confirm by the end of the week, Collins said.


Bay Area Newseducationsan francisco news

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Advocates with the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition hold a rally outside City Hall before the Board of Supervisors were to vote on a resolution supporting the creation of a public banking charter on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Should San Francisco run its own public bank? The debate returns

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Photo by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

People fish at a dock at Islais Creek Park on Thursday, June 10, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What Islais Creek tells us about rising sea levels in San Francisco

Islais Creek is an unassuming waterway along San Francisco’s eastern industrial shoreline,… Continue reading

Organizer Jas Florentino, left, explains the figures which represent 350 kidnapped Africans first sold as slaves in the United States in 1619 in sculptor Dana King’s “Monumental Reckoning.” The installation is in the space of the former Francis Scott Key monument in Golden Gate Park. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What a reparations program would look like in The City

‘If there’s any place we can do it, it’s San Francisco’

Officer Joel Babbs, pictured at a protest outside the Hall of Justice in 2017, is representing himself in an unusually public police misconduct matter. <ins>(Courtesy Bay City News)</ins>
The strange and troubling story of Joel Babbs: What it tells us about the SFPD

The bizarre and troubling career of a whistle-blowing San Francisco police officer… Continue reading

Most Read