San Francisco nears compromise on employer health funds

The Board of Supervisors’ effort to close a loophole in San Francisco’s landmark universal health care law remains the center of debate despite months of discussions and political wrangling over how to fix the problem.

But it appears a compromise has emerged that everyone can live with.

One proposal introduced by Supervisor David Campos was approved by the board, but only with six votes, and then Mayor Ed Lee vetoed it last week.

Now the board is focused on a different solution, which was introduced by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu as a compromise with business advocates who denounced an earlier proposal by  Campos.

About 860 businesses — mostly restaurants — put money in what is known as a health reimbursement account to comply with the law, which mandates a certain amount of money is spent per employee per hour worked. It was recently exposed that 80 percent of the money for worker health care costs returns to the employer, which amounted to $50 million last year.

The main issue is how much and for how long money should remain in the accounts. Campos’ proposal would have the money remain in the accounts year after year. But business advocates said that would be a $50 million hit and result in job losses and even business closures.

Chiu’s original legislation proposed requiring that accounts have a year’s worth of funding at any given time. On Tuesday, Supervisor Malia Cohen amended Chiu’s legislation to ensure workers could accrue up to two years’ worth of health care funding at any given time — a proposal that appears to have the support of most of her colleagues. Chiu said that “the two-year time frame does make sense.”

“These amendments are the result of many, many months of conversations with many stakeholders,” Cohen said.

Lee signaled his support of the amended legislation Tuesday.

“By closing the loophole through these proposed amendments, we can increase access to health care, protect jobs in our small businesses and protect consumers while growing our economy at the same time,” Lee said in a statement. “These are goals I have embraced from the beginning of this discussion, and I thank the board for putting forward amendments that align with these goals.”

Campos, who realizes his proposal is doomed by Lee’s veto, supported the spirit of Cohen’s amendments.

“I’m still trying to understand the implications of the amendments, but I think that it’s a very positive step forward,” he said.

The board is scheduled to take a vote on the amended legislation Nov. 15.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsBoard of SupervisorsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPoliticsSan Francisco

Just Posted

ose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014. 
Rose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014.
Willie and Rose: An alliance for the ages

How the Mayor and Chinatown activist shaped San Francisco, then and now

San Francisco supervisors are considering plans to replace trash cans — a “Renaissance” garbage can is pictured on Market Street — with pricey, unnecessary upgrades. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco must end ridiculous and expensive quest for ‘pretty’ trash cans

SF’s unique and pricey garbage bins a dream of disgraced former Public Works director

Giants right fielder Mike Yastrzemski is pictured at bat on July 29 against the Dodgers at Oracle Park; the teams are in the top spots in their league as the season closes. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
With playoff positions on the line, old rivalries get new life

Giants cruised through season, Dodgers not far behind

Golden Gate Park visitors may take a survey about options regarding private car access on John F. Kennedy Drive, which has been the subject of controversy during the pandemic.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Your chance to weigh in: Should JFK remain closed to cars?

Host of mobility improvements for Golden Gate Park proposed

Drivers gathered to urge voters to reject an initiative that would exempt Uber, Lyft, and other gig economy companies from state labor laws, in San Francisco in October 2020. (Jim Wilson/New York Times)
What’s the role of unions in the 21st century?

As membership declines in California, economic inequality increases

Most Read