Rival District 1 candidate David Lee questions Eric Mar backers

District 1 supervisorial candidate David Lee has claimed in ads that incumbent Supervisor Eric Mar is taking questionable funding from super PACs and other special interests. Mar dismissed the ads as “ridiculous lies.”

District 1 supervisorial candidate David Lee has claimed in ads that incumbent Supervisor Eric Mar is taking questionable funding from super PACs and other special interests. Mar dismissed the ads as “ridiculous lies.”

Mudslinging has started in the fierce head-to-head battle over who will represent the Richmond neighborhood as incumbent Supervisor Eric Mar is being blasted about contributions to his campaign.

Former Recreation and Park Commissioner David Lee is characterizing Mar as the super PACs darling. “Don’t let SuperPACs buy this election,” the ad says.

Progressive Mar being criticized by a moderate for being beholden to money from special interests may sound like a backward script, since progressives have long slammed moderate candidates for their deep-pocketed support from downtown interests, including developers and corporations.

“Eric Mar is the opposite of the candidate of the super PACs,” said Mar’s campaign consultant Nicole Derse, who denounced the political ads as negative campaigning making “ludicrous” accusations.  

But Lee’s political consultant Jim Ross makes no apologies for the ads.

“We’re running an issue-based campaign,” Ross said, adding that campaign finance “is an issue that many voters are concerned about.”

A write-up on Mar’s campaign website titled “The Irony” describes the attacks as “ridiculous lies” and calls it ironic that Lee began the attacks at the same time “Downtown money”-backing Lee busted the public financing spending cap “and the real dirty money hasn’t even started flowing yet!”

Lee’s campaign is not alleging that Mar violated any campaign finance laws. It is only suggesting there is something to be wary of about Mar accepting contributions from those with city contracts; benefiting in his 2008 election from $260,000 in special-interest spending; and receiving a $500 donation from Florence Kong, “who has construction firm contracts with the City and who helped underwrite the ethically questioned ‘Run, Ed Run’ effort.”

That effort was pushed by Chinatown power broker Rose Pak in support of Mayor Ed Lee’s campaign for a four-year term.

Lee, however, is ahead in fundraising. As of Sept. 7, Mar reported having raised $144,035, including matching public funds. As of Sept. 13, Lee reported having raised $254,346, including matching public funds.

Third-party spending in support of Lee broke the initial spending cap last week. Under public-financing laws, spending limits are set at $250,000 but increase in increments of $10,000 if total supportive funds for a candidate exceed the cap. It’s now at $270,000, and expected only to keep rising.

The only third-party spending in District 1 reported so far is a total of $42,558 in support of Lee, including $29,725 from the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth PAC, and $4,667 opposing Mar.

“It’s a very close race,” said political analyst and University of San Francisco lecturer David Latterman.  He said that the Lee campaign “has been doing a pretty decent job.”

Pre-Labor Day, the campaign was “building up who Lee is,” and now as people are starting to pay attention to the upcoming election, “they are going on the attack,” Latterman said.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsDavid LeeEric MarGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted changes to The City's streets including Slow Streets closures to increase open space access and the Shared Spaces program, which allows businesses to use public right-of-ways for dining, retail and services. (Examiner illustration)
COVID is reshaping the streets of San Francisco

Walk down Page Street, which is closed to thru-traffic, and you might… Continue reading

At a rally in February, Monthanus Ratanapakdee, left, and Eric Lawson remember Vicha Ratanapakdee, an 84-year-old Thai man who died after he was pushed to the pavement in San Francisco. (Ekevara Kitpowsong/Examiner file photo)
The criminal justice system can’t fix what’s wrong in our community

My 87-year-old mother walks gingerly, slowly, deliberately, one step in front of… Continue reading

Superintendent Vincent Matthews said some students and families who want to return will not be able to do so at this time. “We truly wish we could reopen schools for everyone,” he said. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD sets April reopening date after reaching tentative agreement with teachers union

San Francisco Unified School District has set April 12 as its reopening… Continue reading

José Victor Luna and Maria Anabella Ochoa, who cite health reasons for continuing distance learning, say they have been enjoying walking in Golden Gate Park with their daughters Jazmin, a first grader, and Jessica, a third grader. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Some SFUSD families prefer distance learning

Health issues, classroom uncertainties among reasons for staying home

Most Read