Residents warding off biodiesel fears

Residents are railing against the safety of a biodiesel plant that has been in development for three years, claiming that the facility poses a danger to a nearby school and to the environment.

The $2.4 million project may be built later this year next to the Calera Creek Water Recycling Plant off of Highway 1 and will share the same facilities as the water plant. It is expected to produce 3 million gallons of alternative fuel a year, city officials said.

The project was approved by the City Council last month and must still be approved by the Coastal Commission, a regional agency that regulates the use of land and water on the coastside.

The biodiesel proposal was conceived three years ago by city leaders, a local nonprofit called Liveability Project and Washington-based alternative fuel company Whole Energy.

“I believe all the proponents have lost sight of the forest for the trees — no one understood the scale of what they were proposing,” resident Lionel Emde said. “The bigger it gets, the bigger the risk is. One big spill and the creek is gone.”

Resident Mark Stechbart called the project a “scam” because he claimed the plan wasn’t sufficiently reviewed before its approval. He said that a report on its impact to the surrounding area was inserted as an addendum to the Calera Creek water plant’s own environmental impact report.

But Nancy Hall of Liveability Project said the wastewater treatment plant site is ideal for the biodiesel facility because it is structured to contain any spills.

“That site is designed to handle those kinds of materials — it’s a bowl-shaped parking lot designed in case there is a spill,” said Hall, who drives a biodiesel-fueled car. “That’s one of the reasons it’s such a good fit.”

As a response to the questions by residents, Hall, a Pacifica resident, has launched an informational Web site to provide answers about the project.

The city is also trying to ward off any doubt about the safety of the project. In a meeting tonight, Mayor Jim Vreeland, who has played an important part in planning the biodiesel facility, will address the concerns of some residents and the Pacifica School Board on whether the plant would pose any danger to the nearby Vallemar Elementary School. Vreeland said the city’s analysis does not indicate that the biodiesel facility would add any safety issues for the school.

The Coastal Commission’s decision is expected in April.

svasilyuk@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

File photo
SFPD releases videos of deadly police shooting

Cesar Vargas killed after reports of carjacking with knife

New legislation would make sure supportive housing tenants don’t pay more than 30 percent of their income for rent.. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner))
Supportive housing tenants could get more help paying the rent

Supportive housing tenants struggling to pay rent could soon see their payments… Continue reading

The City requires the recycling or reuse of debris material removed from a construction project site. <ins>(Emma Chiang/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Permits proposed for haulers of construction debris to achieve zero-waste

San Francisco plans to tighten regulations on the disposal of construction and… Continue reading

(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/TNS)
Newsom says California will review FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines before releasing to public

By Taryn Luna Los Angeles Times California will review the safety of… Continue reading

Rachael Tanner, left, testifies virtually before the Board of Supervisors Rules Committee Monday, October 19, 2020. (SFGOV courtesy art)
Rachael Tanner set to become SF’s next Planning Commissioner

Rachael Tanner is expected to serve as the newest member of the… Continue reading

Most Read