Removing graffiti can be risky

Wiping graffiti off buildings, benches and bus shelters might make The City easier on the eyes, but some of the chemicals used for those efforts are not easy on the health of city workers, according to a new city document.

Some of the dozens of products used to combat graffiti in The City are “extremely hazardous” to humans and are “widely used by city staff,” according to a document released by the Department of Environment.

Some products contain harmful chemicals, including carcinogens and other toxins that can cause cancer, reproductive problems and asthma among other health conditions, the document said.

And while toxic graffiti removal products are said to be widely used, officials told The Examiner on Monday there is no viable accounting method to determine exactly how much are being used daily or annually.

Whatever the scale, having city departments use less-toxic products has become a high priority, said Chris Geiger, a toxicologist who works as a green purchasing program manager for the Department of Environment.

As part of a green purchasing initiative begun in 2005, the department wants to move city departments toward purchasing and using healthier alternatives to wipe off graffiti, Geiger said. Currently, departments are only recommended to use alternative products and methods.

The department has set a goal for the next three years to finalize a list of graffiti removal products that work best and are the least hazardous so that guidelines may be written into stone, he said.

Geiger doesn’t believe it is accurate to say The City is widely using hazardous products in graffiti removal. In fact, San Francisco has been pioneering the use of alternative products and methods for various city projects and services, including graffiti removal, and has set up an online catalog filled with so-called “S.F.-approved” green products, he said.

“We know there is a potential problem out there,” Geiger said. “We want to work on it.”

Various city departments, including Muni and the Department of Public Works, are already testing or using healthier alternatives to wiping off graffiti, he said.

Muni, for instance, has been experimenting with an environmentally friendly orange oil product to eliminate graffiti on vehicles, though workers have complained of a strong smell emitted by the substance, Geiger said. City agencies are also testing soy-based products, he said.

DPW spokeswoman Christine Falvey said crews in her department use paint to cover up the “vast majority” of graffiti on public property. When they must use the toxic graffiti removers, staff is trained to use gloves and goggles for protection, she said.

The DPW “has discontinued use of some graffiti removers over the years in favor of products that are better for our staff, the public and the environment,” Falvey said.

 

Green purchasing priorities

Along with establishing guidelines for purchasing healthier, environmentally friendly products for graffiti removal, The City also wants to set guidelines for the purchase of these products and materials:

Bags (plastic and compostable)

Carpet

Computer server

Dairy products

Food containers

Janitorial cleaning products

Janitorial disinfectant

Janitorial equipment

Janitorial floor care products

Janitorial paper

Janitorial services

Lighting

Office supplies

Paints

Street cleaning detergents

Synthetic turf

Telecommunications equipment

Toner and cartridges

Weed barriers and mulches

Source: San Francisco Department of Environment

Bay Area NewsLocal

Just Posted

A large crack winds its way up a sidewalk along China Basin Street in Mission Bay on Friday, Sept. 24, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco’s sinking sidewalks: Is climate change to blame?

‘In the last couple months, it’s been a noticeable change’

For years, Facebook employees have identified serious harms and proposed potential fixes. CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg have rejected the remedies, causing whisteblowers to multiple. (Eric Thayer/The New York Times)
Facebook’s problems at the top: Social media giant is not listening to whistleblowers

Whistleblowers multiply, but Zuckerberg and Sandberg don’t heed their warnings

Niners quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo led a late-game comeback against the Packers, but San Francisco lost, 30-28, on a late field goal. (Courtesy of San Francisco 49ers)
The Packers beat the Niners in a heartbreaker: Don’t panic

San Francisco is no better and no worse than you thought they were.

A new ruling will thwart the growth of solar installation companies like Luminalt, which was founded in an Outer Sunset garage and is majority woman owned. (Philip Cheung, New York Times)
A threat to California’s solar future and diverse employment pathways

A new ruling creates barriers to entering the clean energy workforce

Federal officials have endorsed booster shots of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for many fully inoculated Americans. (Kevin Mohatt/New York Times)
When Californians will get COVID-19 boosters

Eligibility currently limited to those inoculated with Pfizer vaccine

Most Read