Regulators scrutinize proposed PG&E settlement

A settlement characterized by critics as a “backroom deal” between PG&E and its regulator was blasted in a hearing Monday, both for its content and how it came to be.

Among the harshest critics were members of the commission being asked to approve the deal next month. If they don’t do so, PG&E could be forced to defend itself against contempt charges.

The deal struck between PG&E and employees of the California Public Utilities Commission would resolve a conflict over whether the utility disregarded an order to submit documentation about pipeline safety. If approved, PG&E would pay a fine of $3 million to $6 million, but not admit guilt.

Commissioner Timothy Simon described the deal as a disappointing surprise.

“I am deeply concerned that my office was not at least notified of the fact that settlement discussions were in place and that a settlement had been adopted,” said Simon, who was appointed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Simon said the potential $6 million penalty — $3 million of which may never be paid if PG&E meets its deadlines — was exceedingly low, considering that a top PG&E executive recently received a $3.2 million severance package. He also complained that PG&E’s deadline for complying with the settlement is not sufficiently rigorous.

“Why will it take nearly a year after the San Bruno explosion for PG&E to demonstrate to the commission and the public that it’s not putting neighborhoods at risk of an explosion?” Simon said.

After a pipeline exploded in San Bruno and killed eight people, the commission ordered PG&E to re-evaluate the operating pressure of some 1,800 miles of gas transmission pipelines. Specifically, it asked for proof that PG&E’s pipelines could withstand their current operating pressures.

PG&E filed its documentation by the March 15 deadline. But within a day, CPUC executive director Paul Clanon accused the utility of contempt for failing to provide the required information, threatening to fine the company up to $1 million a day. The settlement stemmed from the negotiations that resulted.

PG&E attorney Joseph Malkin said Clanon’s letter took the utility by surprise, claiming that a “failure of communication” between the company and the agency’s staff led it to conclude that its submission was fine. Clanon said his staff never gave such assurances.

The deal itself came under fire from Commissioner Catherine J.K. Sandoval for giving PG&E too much flexibility and not providing the commission with enough oversight. The commissioner, a recent appointee of Gov. Jerry Brown, also griped that PG&E would not be obligated to comply with recommendations of the commission’s staff.

Malkin said PG&E is motivated to comply with such recommendations, but didn’t want to explicitly agree to it in the document.

“We didn’t want the power to go to anybody’s head,” he said.


What they said at the hearing on a proposed settlement with PG&E

“This isn’t simply a question of whether or not PG&E has turned in its homework on time.”

Stephanie Chin, The Greenlining Institute


“We shouldn’t be waiting to do actual improvements until we have all the records, and particularly when it’s going to take a very long time to get all of the records together.”

Theresa Mueller, S.F. deputy city attorney


“I can’t control the irresponsibility of some in the political world or in the media who refuse to characterize properly what the stipulation sets forth.”

— CPUC President Michael Peevey, criticizing the characterization of the settlement between PG&E and the CPUC as being too easy on PG&E

Arnold SchwarzeneggerBay Area NewsJerry BrownLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

The sidewalk on Egbert Avenue in the Bayview recently was cluttered with car parts, tires and other junk. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
New surveillance effort aims to crack down on illegal dumping

’We want to make sure we catch people who are trashing our streets’

The recall election for California Gov. Gavin Newsom is scheduled for Sept. 14. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF could play a big role in overcoming Democrat apathy, driving voter turnout for Newsom

San Francisco voters are not used to swaying elections. Just think of… Continue reading

Health care workers treat a Covid-19 patient who needs to be intubated before being put on a ventilator at Providence St. Mary Medical Center during a surge of cases in Apple Valley, Dec. 17, 2020. Confronted with surging infections, California became the first state in the country to mandate coronavirus vaccines or testing for state employees and health-care workers. (Ariana Drehsler/The New York Times)
In California, a mix of support and resistance to new vaccine rules

By Shawn Hubler, Livia Albeck-Ripka and Soumya Karlamangla New York Times SACRAMENTO… Continue reading

Dave Hodges, pastor at Zide Door, the Church of Entheogenic Plants that include marijuana and psilocybin mushrooms, holds some psychedelic mushrooms inside the Oakland church on Friday, July 22, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Psychedelic spirituality: Inside a growing Bay Area religious movement

‘They are guiding us into something ineffable’

Most Read