A vote rejecting an environmental review of a landfill contract was a win for Recology. (Michael Ares/Special to the S.F. Examiner)

Recology scores a victory in landfill agreement dispute

San Francisco’s garbage is destined for a new home, following a Board of Supervisors unanimous vote Tuesday to reject an appeal for environmental review of a new landfill agreement.

The appeal was turned down even though garbage trucks will now have to travel 40 round-trip miles farther than before.

The vote was a significant victory for Recology, who operates the Hay Road landfill in Solano County — the place San Francisco’s trash will now end up.

The company has long operated a trash hauling monopoly, but until now hasn’t had the landfill piece of the refuse business.

After a brief discussion, the board unanimously rejected the appeal calling for environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. The appeal was filed by Solano County Orderly Growth Committee arguing the Planning Department’s decision to not do the review was flawed.

The decision was a blow to Houston-based Waste Management, which operates the Altamont landfill where San Francisco’s refuse is currently trucked.

Adding to the political intrigue was the San Francisco Chapter of the Sierra Club, who threw its political might behind the appeal, including sending out 30,000 mailers last week. The mailers were similar to the 40,000 mailed by Waste Management.

Duane Kromm, a former Solano County supervisor and leader of the committee that filed the appeal, said the vote came as a surprise. “Eleven-zip against. I was appalled,” he said.

Kromm said “legal action” will likely be next, although he noted, “The problem with fighting garbage is the money is so big.”

Supervisor Eric Mar, noting the landfill fight dates back many years, characterized the issue between Recology and Waste Management as “a battle with two elephants in the room.”

Supervisor Scott Wiener suggested the CEQA appeal was really about those who oppose the deal, not about environmental impacts.

“It strikes me as a dispute between some residents and Solano County and their own county government that they don’t want a landfill,” Wiener said. “I can’t blame them.”

Under the $130 million landfill agreement with Recology, which Deborah Raphael, director of The City’s Department of the Environment signed in July, the company will haul the trash to its Hay Road landfill in Solano County, which is 155 round-trip miles away, about 40 miles longer than to the Altamont Landfill. There would be up to 50 truck trips per day.

Appellants argued a fuller review was needed to analyze the possibility of more than 50 trucks per day, suggesting disposed tons would increase — not decrease as assumed. Also they questioned the emission calculations, among other items.

Paul Maltzer, a San Francisco city planner, told the board that the decision was “pretty straight forward.”

“What is proposed is a change in truck routes,” he said.

Maltzer said adding the trucks to Interstate 80, which has an average daily volume of about 115,000 vehicles, is “almost irrelevant in terms of air quality impacts.”

Mark Arsenault, a Recology employee, said, “I am quite confident that our diversion efforts will exceed the growth of The City.”

Recology drew support from Tim Paulson, executive director of the San Francisco Labor Council and members of the Teamsters union, which represents trash haulers.

A previous landfill agreement approved by the board in 2011 for Recology to haul waste by rail to Yuba County was scrapped amid three lawsuits alleging improper bidding and inadequate environmental review. The Hay Road plan was Recology’s backup plan.

Guillermo Rodriguez, a spokesman for the Department of the Environment, said the contract with Waste Management is based on the number of tonnage disposed, which is expected to expire in January 2016. That is when the trucks are expected to start hauling the waste to Solano.

A pending lawsuit filed by Waste Management alleging improper bidding remains in the courts. A Recology spokesman previously noted Waste Management’s proposal would have cost “an extra $13 million a year.”

Last year 373,940 tons of San Francisco’s waste ended up in the landfill. The City has a goal of sending no waste to the landfill after 2020.

Board of SupervisorsCity HallJohn AvalosMuniMunicipal Transportation AgencySan FranciscoScott WienerSierra Clubwaste

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Anti-eviction demonstrators rally outside San Francisco Superior Court. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Report: Unpaid rent due to COVID-19 could be up to $32.7M per month

A new city report that attempts to quantify how much rent has… Continue reading

Music venues around The City have largely been unable to reopen due to ongoing pandemic health orders. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF to cut $2.5M in fees to help 300 nightlife venues

San Francisco will cut $2.5 million in fees for hundreds of entertainment… Continue reading

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett departs the U.S. Capitol on October 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump nominated Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after Ginsburg’s death. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images)
GOP senators confirm Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court in partisan vote

By Jennifer Haberkorn Los Angeles Times The Senate on Monday confirmed Judge… Continue reading

Curator Tim Burgard looks over a section of the galleries comprising “The de Young Open,” a huge, varied collection of work by Bay Area artists. (Photo courtesy Gary Sexton/Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco)
Bay Area artists jam-pack vivid ‘de Young Open’

Huge exhibition — with works for sale — showcases diversity, supports community

SF Board of Education vice president Gabriela Lopez and commissioner Alison Collins listen at a news conference condemning recent racist and social media attacks targeted at them and the two student representatives on Monday, Oct. 26, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Online attacks on school board members denounced by city officials

City officials on Monday condemned the targeting of school board members, both… Continue reading

Most Read