Proposal could cost city some green

Proposed green building requirements for privately owned buildings would, in the short run, reduce construction, increase the price of rents and owner-occupied housing, increase commercial rents and could discourage businesses from moving to The City, according to an economic impact report by the Controller’s Office.

“The legislation would impose a considerable cost on San Francisco’s economy in the short term, although this cost is projected to decline after seven to 10 years,” according to the report.

The proposal would reduce The City’s carbon dioxide emissions by more than 1 million tons by 2027, according to the report.

Just Posted

Central Subway project projected to run $55 million over budget

San Francisco’s $1.6 billion Central Subway is roughly $55 million in the… Continue reading

HUD secretary calls for increased deregulation after tour of Potrero Hill public housing

Carson calls for greater ‘cooperation’ between local, federal officials but offers no additional funds

Suspect in high-profile waterfront attack ordered to stand trial

Judge adds charge against Austin James Vincent for alleged criminal threats

SF increases public funding to help those running for mayor, supervisor

Those running for the Board of Supervisors or mayor will have access… Continue reading

SF supervisors call on health department to ‘pause’ planned relocation of mental health patients

Tensions high as protest by over closure of long-term beds shuts down Health Commission meeting

Most Read