Proposal could cost city some green

Proposed green building requirements for privately owned buildings would, in the short run, reduce construction, increase the price of rents and owner-occupied housing, increase commercial rents and could discourage businesses from moving to The City, according to an economic impact report by the Controller’s Office.

“The legislation would impose a considerable cost on San Francisco’s economy in the short term, although this cost is projected to decline after seven to 10 years,” according to the report.

The proposal would reduce The City’s carbon dioxide emissions by more than 1 million tons by 2027, according to the report.

Just Posted

Drivers looking for a shortcut to get steered off Page Street

Drivers be warned: If you’re looking to circumvent Oak Street traffic to… Continue reading

Muni aims to end operator shortage by summer 2021

Director of Transit warns that further service improvements may not be possible until then

Man fatally stabbed during fight on BART train in Hayward

A man in his 40s was fatally stabbed in a fight on… Continue reading

ADUs for me and you

Whether you agree with Bernie Sanders that Apple “helped create the housing… Continue reading

Battle brews within SF police union over leadership style

Gary Delagnes-endorsed candidate to challenge Tony Montoya for presidency

Most Read