Proposal could cost city some green

Proposed green building requirements for privately owned buildings would, in the short run, reduce construction, increase the price of rents and owner-occupied housing, increase commercial rents and could discourage businesses from moving to The City, according to an economic impact report by the Controller’s Office.

“The legislation would impose a considerable cost on San Francisco’s economy in the short term, although this cost is projected to decline after seven to 10 years,” according to the report.

The proposal would reduce The City’s carbon dioxide emissions by more than 1 million tons by 2027, according to the report.

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Caltrain’s future in jeopardy after supervisors block sales tax measure

Roughly 90 minutes into Tuesday’s San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting, local… Continue reading

Feds target donations from city contractors with new subpoena in Nuru scandal

Federal authorities have homed in on an apparent trail of donations from… Continue reading

Police union opposes proposal to hang ‘Black Lives Matter’ posters at stations

SFPOA criticizes plan for injecting ‘political agendas and wedge issues’ into policing

Twitter blocks verified accounts from posting after hack hits high-profile users

After the Twitter accounts of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kanye West and… Continue reading

Private, charter schools likely forced to begin semester with distance learning

Private and charter schools that may have planned a return to in-person… Continue reading

Most Read