Prop G would decry corporate money in politics

AP File PhotoNewt Gingrich benefited from substantial spending by the super PAC “Winning Our Future” in support of his campaign.

AP File PhotoNewt Gingrich benefited from substantial spending by the super PAC “Winning Our Future” in support of his campaign.

In Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment to the Constitution allows corporations, much like individuals, to make independent political expenditures without restriction. The ruling helped spawn a new wave of so-called super PACs that are dominating political spending in the 2012 presidential campaign.

Meanwhile in San Francisco, Proposition G is an effort to apply pressure to effect a national reversal of that policy by putting city voters on record as officially denouncing the 2010 high court ruling that opened the floodgates for such corporate political spending.

As a policy statement with no force of law, the measure is intended to encourage San Francisco’s representatives in Congress to work to reform the system that governs campaign spending in the wake of the Citizens United ruling.

If approved, the proposition would make it official city policy “that corporations should not have the same constitutional rights as human beings and should be subject to political spending limits.”

The measure complements similar efforts emerging nationwide as a backlash to the ruling.

Prop. G was introduced by supervisors John Avalos and David Campos and placed on the ballot by a vote of the Board of Supervisors. All 11 supervisors support the measure, along with the nonprofit political reform lobby Common Cause.  

“The problem with money in politics is not so much the amount that is spent on campaigns as it is who pays for them, what they get in return, and how that affects public policy and spending priorities,” Common Cause says about money in politics on its website.  

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsBoard of SupervisorsDavid CamposGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott leaves the scene of an officer-involved shooting at Brannan Street and Jack London Alley in the South Park area on Friday, May 7, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Chief Scott issues rare apology to man shot by SF police

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott issued a rare apology Thursday to… Continue reading

Despite the pandemic, San Francisco has ended the fiscal year with a budget surplus. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Better than expected tax revenues leave city with $157.3M surplus for this year

As the fiscal year nears an end and Mayor London Breed prepares… Continue reading

Passengers board a BART train bound for the San Francisco Airport at Powell Street station. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
BART bumps up service restoration to August 30, offers fare discounts

Rail agency breaks pandemic ridership records, prepares to welcome more passengers

Ashley and Michelle Monterrosa hold a photo of their brother Sean Monterrosa, who was killed by a Vallejo police officer early Tuesday morning, as they are comforted at a memorial rally at the 24th Street Mission BART plaza on Friday, June 5, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
State Department of Justice to investigate Sean Monterrosa shooting by Vallejo police

Attorney General Rob Bonta steps in after Solano County DA declines case

Gov. Gavin Newsom, show here speaking at the City College of San Francisco mass vaccination site in April, faces a recall election due to anger on the right over his handling of the pandemic, among other issues. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Why Gavin Newsom’s popularity could work against him in the recall election

Top pollster: ‘We’re not seeing the Democrats engaged in this election. And that may be a problem…’

Most Read