A poll released Wednesday shows San Francisco voters would support a measure increasing The City’s affordable housing requirements of private developers. (mike koozmin/s.f. examiner)

A poll released Wednesday shows San Francisco voters would support a measure increasing The City’s affordable housing requirements of private developers. (mike koozmin/s.f. examiner)

Poll shows strong support for June ballot measure to raise affordable housing requirements

San Francisco voters would support a ballot measure as early as next summer that more than doubles the below-market-rate housing requirements of private developers.

That’s according to a poll released Wednesday by the South of Market nonprofit development firm Tenants and Owners Development Corp., which asked 400 voters to weigh in on the housing crisis and whether city officials are adequately tackling the issue.

The poll results come a week after Mayor Ed Lee announced he is pursuing a charter amendment likely for the November 2016 ballot that would require more below-market-rate housing in new residential developments, though an exact amount has yet to be determined. Lee is convening a housing working group to establish the possible changes.

The current inclusionary requirements call for developers of projects with at least 10 residential units to pay a fee, build 12 percent of below market-rate housing on the same site as the market-rate project, or build 20 percent of such units at another location.

Of the voters surveyed in TODCO’s poll, 71 percent said they would support a June measure to increase the below-market-rate housing requirement from 12 percent to 25 percent on-site, with 15 percent dedicated to lower-income residents and 10 percent for middle-income residents.

“My takeaway from this poll is that the public will vote yes to increase inclusionary housing,” said John Elberling, TODCO’s director and a member of the mayor’s housing working group. “Getting 71 percent support for that is huge. That’s a landslide.”

The poll also revealed that most respondents — 82 percent — are aware of the housing crisis, and 61 percent disapprove of The City’s efforts to address the problem. Additionally, 41 percent of respondents said they feel personally affected by the housing crisis.

“People are scared,” Elberling said. “They’re scared about losing their home, and not being able to find a new place if they have to move.”

Elberling also noted that the poll showed strong support for a measure in June, as opposed to November when the presidential election will likely bring a greater electorate turnout.

“The City can’t wait until the November election to do this,” Elberling said. “We don’t have five months to wait. It’s a crisis now and The City has to take action now.”

City leaders have said that increasing inclusionary housing requirements would better align San Francisco with its goal of earmarking 33 percent of all new homes as below market-rate — an effort supported by voters last year through Proposition K.

Most developments don’t include that level of below market-rate homes. Data from the second Housing Balance Report, released by the Planning Department in September, found 28 percent of net new housing produced between July 2005 and June 2015 was below market-rate.

Tweaks to the current inclusionary requirements are already in the works. Earlier this year, the mayor and Supervisor Mark Farrell introduced amendments to the inclusionary housing ordinance that would include the creation of a “dial” to allow a project sponsor — without spending more money — to build additional below-market-rate homes for residents who fall in the middle-income category.

The poll, commissioned before the mayor’s announcement by TODCO, was conducted by David Binder Research between Dec. 3 and 6 with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percent.

Planning

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco lacks housing data that would let it track rental vacancies and prices. New legislation is seeking to change that.<ins> (Photo by Joel Angel Jurez/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Landlords blast proposal to require annual report on rentals as invasion of privacy

Housing inventory could give city better data on housing vacancies, affordability

Health care workers would be the first group in the state to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. (Go Nakamura/Getty Images/TNS)
Hope on the way: Here’s what to know about California’s COVID-19 vaccine plan

The first batch of doses could hit the state as soon as early December

The Big Game was played Friday at Memorial Stadium in Berkeley. (Shutterstock)
Stanford blocks extra point to stun Cal, win 123rd Big Game 24-23

The 123rd edition of the Big Game featured a number of firsts.… Continue reading

Psilocybin magic mushrooms (Shutterstock)
‘Magic mushrooms’ moving into the mainstream

Efforts to decriminalize psychedelics could follow several different paths

The 2020 Census has concluded taking responses sooner than expected. (Courtesy photo)
What does California have to lose if undocumented immigrants are excluded from the census?

By Kim Bojórquez The Sacramento Bee If The U.S. Supreme Court rules… Continue reading

Most Read