In this file photo, former Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, right, sits with supervisors Eric Mar, center, and David Campos while discussing plans at City Hall for San Francisco to have an elected public advocate. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

In this file photo, former Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, right, sits with supervisors Eric Mar, center, and David Campos while discussing plans at City Hall for San Francisco to have an elected public advocate. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

Political tensions rise ahead of deadline for November ballot measures

Political tensions remained high at City Hall on Thursday as the Board of Supervisors enters crunch time to place measures on the November ballot.

At stake are policy choices that highlight San Francisco’s political divide between moderates and progressives and would reduce the mayor’s political power.

The political division prompted the progressive bloc to take an unusual legislative move Wednesday and call a special Board of Supervisors meeting at 5:15 p.m Friday, effectively bypassing the usual legislative process of having proposals considered by board committees and thus elevating its political leverage.

Supervisor Katy Tang, who chairs the board’s Rules Committee, has faced allegations of blocking ballot measures by progressive board members, something she denies. Among them is the public advocate charter amendment proposed by Supervisor David Campos.

That proposal has faced strong opposition from labor unions who traditionally don’t support progressive candidates, including the Building and Construction Trades Council.

“We do not see the necessity or even the utility of such an office,” Michael Theriault, building trades union secretary, wrote in a letter to the committee.

Tang and Supervisor Malia Cohen voted 2-1 Thursday to send the public advocate ballot measure to the full board for a vote, but only after making changes to the proposal that Campos opposes.

Friday’s special board meeting, however, along with another special board meeting progressives also scheduled for July 29 ensures Campos’ version can make the November ballot.

Tang, meanwhile, defended her actions Thursday. “It’s 98 percent his measure. Ninety-eight percent,” Tang told the San Francisco Examiner. “[Progressive supervisors] amend our stuff all the time. When that happens no one blinks an eye. But when we amend someone else’s item, because we believe it’s good policy, it’s corruption.”

The amendments were significant in that they eliminated the appointment power of the public advocate for the directors of Office of Labor Standards Enforcement and Office of Citizen Complaints — a power the mayor currently has — and prohibited anyone from serving in the post for four years after being in a local elected office, which would block Campos, for example, from running for the post.

Board President London Breed did not return calls for comment about the recent political developments, but wrote in a text message Thursday that the special board meeting maneuver was “politics at its worse [sic] and I’m not going to be a part of it.”

Supervisor Aaron Peskin deflected that criticism. “She was very cordial to me when I told her about it,” he said.

The progressive bloc has criticized Breed, who makes appointments to board committees, for creating moderate majorities on key legislative committees, like the Rules Committee, when the board itself has a progressive majority.

The Rules Committee also held a hearing Thursday on another politically-charged charter amendment introduced by Peskin that would create a commission overseeing the Mayor’s Office of Housing, and Economic and Workforce Development, which critics see as a power grab.

Peskin and the Mayor’s Office remain in discussions of a possible compromise. Both directors of those departments say the commission would impair their functions.

The Rules Committee did make amendments to Peskin’s liking and will hold a special committee hearing on the proposal Monday, but the special board meeting Friday will also vote to pull the measure from committee as well.

Meanwhile, there remains a debate on the board over whether to place on the ballot the mayor’s .75 percent sales tax hike, and progressives are trying to convince Supervisor Mark Farrell to pull his controversial homeless encampment measure from the November ballot.

The last day for the board to submit charter amendments for the November ballot is July 29.Aaron PeskinBoard of SupervisorsdivisivenessEric MarKaty TangMalia CohenmoderatesPoliticsprogressivesSan Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Some people are concerned that University of California, San Francisco’s expansion at its Parnassus campus could cause an undesirable increase in the number of riders on Muni’s N-Judah line.<ins></ins>
Will UCSF’s $20 million pledge to SFMTA offset traffic woes?

An even more crowded N-Judah plus increased congestion ahead cause concern

A health care worker receives one of the first COVID-19 vaccine doses at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital on Tuesday Dec. 15, 2020. (Courtesy SFgov)
SF to open three large sites for COVID-19 vaccinations

Breed: ‘We need more doses. We are asking for more doses’

San Jose Sharks (pictured Feb. 15, 2020 vs. Minnesota Wild at Xcel Energy Center) open the season on Monday against the St. Louis Blues in St. Louis. (Tribune News Service archive)
This week in Bay Area sports

A look at the upcoming major Bay Area sports events (schedules subject… Continue reading

Tongo Eisen-Martin, a Bernal Heights resident, named San Francisco’s eighth poet laureate. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Tongo Eisen-Martin becomes San Francisco’s eighth poet laureate

Bernal Heights resident Tongo Eisen-Martin has become San Francisco’s eighth poet laureate.… Continue reading

Homeless people's tents can be seen on Golden Gate Avenue in the Tenderloin on Wednesday afternoon, Dec. 16, 2020. (Photo by Ekevara Kitpowsong/S.F. Examiner)
Statewide business tax could bring new funds to combat homelessness

San Francisco could get more than $100 million a year for housing, rental assistance, shelter beds

Most Read