The Planning Commission voted against legislation that would skip the need for conditional use permits. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

The Planning Commission voted against legislation that would skip the need for conditional use permits. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

Planning Commission favors maintaining conditional use process for below-market-rate developments

Legislation that could speed up the production of below-market-rate housing projects by up to a year will still continue to wend its way through The City’s approval process, despite rejection of the planning code amendment by the Planning Commission on Thursday.

After a lengthy discussion, commissioners voted 3-3 against recommending approval of the legislation to the Board of Supervisors, with Vice President Cindy Wu and commissioners Dennis Richards and Kathrin Moore as the dissenting votes. Commissioner Christine Johnson was absent.

The legislation, however, will still be heard at the Board of Supervisors’ Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting in January and is not constrained by the commission’s vote, said Supervisor Scott Wiener, who introduced the legislation in September.

But the meeting served as an opportunity for commissioners to dissect legislation, pointing out what some consider potentially detrimental results of allowing projects that propose to build 100 percent below-market-rate homes to bypass the conditional use process.

Currently, conditional use requirements are needed for developments that are proposed on lots over 10,000 square feet, exceed certain height limits, demolish grocery stores or movie theaters, or request exemptions from various features like parking, among other construction changes. Such requests must be approved by the Planning Commission.

The legislation would amend the planning code to allow projects that will offer 100 percent below-market-rate homes for at least 55 years to skip the need for conditional use permits. The homes must be affordable to households that earn up to 120 percent of the area median income.

“This legislation focuses on expediting the production of low-income and moderate-income [housing], which are the two categories that we really need,” Wiener told commissioners at Thursday’s meeting. “It does so in a way where neighbors still receive notice … and still have an opportunity to provide feedback and engage with the developer and planning staff.”

But Commissioner Kathrin Moore said eliminating the commission’s approval of conditional use requirements would shortcut the public process because the commission hears such requests from developers during publicly held meetings.

“Any claims of increasing efficiency is not increased by taking the public’s right to hear a [conditional use] or this commission to deliberate on one,” Moore said. “It’s not going to make it more efficient.”

Wiener countered that residents may still request a discretionary review of any project, which would trigger a public hearing.

“To suggest that not having a conditional use means there’s no public process is not accurate,” Wiener said.

Peter Cohen, co-director of the
nonprofit SF Council of Community Housing Organizations that champions for below-market-rate housing but has not taken a stance on Wiener’s legislation, said there must be a balance between increasing efficiency of building such homes and maintaining community engagements.

“For affordable housing … the relationships that are built through the public approval process are important,” Cohen said. “The accountability that we hold for affordable housing is important.”

affordable housingBoard of Supervisorsdevelopmenthousing crisisPlanningPlanning CommissionScott Wiener

Just Posted

Cabernet sauvignon grapes sat in a container after being crushed at Smith-Madrone Winery in St. Helena. (Courtesy Smith-Madrone Winery)
San Francisco’s ‘Champagne problems’ — Wine industry suffers supply chain woes

‘Everywhere you turn, things that were easy are no longer easy’

Glasses behind the bar at LUNA in the Mission District on Friday, Oct. 15, 2021. Glassware is just one of the many things restaurants have had trouble keeping in stock as supply chain problems ripple outward. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF restaurants face product shortages and skyrocketing costs

‘The supply chain crisis has impacted us in almost every way imaginable’

A Giants fans hangs his head in disbelief after the Dodgers won the NLDS in a controversial finish to a tight Game 5. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
Giants dream season ends at the hands of the Dodgers, 2-1

A masterful game comes down to the bottom of the ninth, and San Francisco came up short

<strong>Workers with Urban Alchemy and the Downtown Streets Team clean at Seventh and Market streets on Oct. 12. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins> </strong>
<ins></ins>
Why is it so hard to keep San Francisco’s streets clean?

Some blame bureaucracy, others say it’s the residents’ fault

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — seen in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday — touted Congressional Democrats’ infrastructure bill in San Francisco on Thursday. (Stefani Reynolds/The New York Times)
Pelosi touts infrastructure bill as it nears finish line

Climate change, social safety net among major priorities of Democrats’ 10-year funding measure

Most Read