PG&E hit with second lawsuit

A second person affected by the natural-gas line explosion in San Bruno has filed a class-action lawsuit asking for compensation and independent control of a relief fund created by PG&E.

One of PG&E’s 30-inch natural-gas lines exploded in a residential neighborhood of the Peninsula city Sept. 9. The blast and ensuing conflagration killed eight people, injured dozens and destroyed many homes.

The lawsuit filed Tuesday, pressed by San Bruno resident Daniele DiTrapani, is worded almost precisely as the first lawsuit filed, which was brought by another San Bruno resident.

Neither of the residents lost their homes in the fire or were injured.

Both lawsuits allege widespread harm to the community caused by the explosion of a 30-inch natural-gas transmission line owned and operated by the utility company.

The line — for reasons that have yet to be determined — blew up and caught fire. In the days after the explosion, PG&E created a $100 million Rebuild San Bruno Fund to compensate those who were affected by the catastrophe.

Both of the filed lawsuits have demanded that the fund be turned over to a court-supervised escrow account, so a third party can supervise the distribution of the money.

Also, the lawsuits accuse PG&E of negligence and creating a public nuisance.

“The threat from the PG&E Explosion for San Bruno continues today,” DiTrapani’s lawsuit reads. “Residents of the Crestmoor neighborhood have been contaminated by debris, ash, toxins and other chemicals as a result of the PG&E Explosion, thereby posing an environmental hazard to these individuals.”

Neither DiTrapani nor his attorney, Vahn Alexander of Los Angeles,  returned calls about the lawsuit.

PG&E is still reviewing the filings and would not comment on the specific allegations, company spokeswoman Katie Romans said.

Bay Area NewsLocalPG&ESan Bruno

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

From left, California state Sen. Milton Marks, Sen. Nicholas Petris, Assemblyman John Knox and Save San Francisco Bay Association co-founders Esther Gulick, Sylvia McLaughlin and Kay Kerr watch Gov. Ronald Reagan sign the bill establishing the Bay Conservation and Development Commission as a permanent agency in 1969. (Courtesy Save The Bay)
Sixty years of Saving San Francisco Bay

Pioneering environmental group was started by three ladies on a mission

Temporary high-occupancy vehicle lanes will be added to sections of state Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 101, including Park Presidio Boulevard, to keep traffic flowing as The City reopens. <ins>(Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Transit and high-occupancy vehicle lanes coming to some of The City’s busiest streets

Changes intended to improve transit reliability as traffic increases with reopening

Tents filled up a safe camping site in a former parking lot at 180 Jones St. in the Tenderloin in June 2020.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Proposal for major expansion of safe sleeping sites gets cool reception in committee

Supervisor Mandelman calls for creation of more temporary shelter sites to get homeless off streets

A surplus of	mice on the Farallon Islands have caused banded burrowing owls to stay year round instead of migrating, longtime researchers say. <ins>(Courtesy Point Blue Conservation Science)</ins>
Farallon Islands researchers recommend eradicating mice

The Farallon Islands comprise three groups of small islands located nearly 30… Continue reading

Once we can come and go more freely, will people gather the way they did before COVID? <ins>(Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner file photo)</ins>
What happens when the pandemic is over?

After experiencing initial excitement, I wonder just how much I’ll go out

Most Read