Despite efforts otherwise, plans to improve bicycling conditions on Masonic Avenue have stalled for the past five years. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

Despite efforts otherwise, plans to improve bicycling conditions on Masonic Avenue have stalled for the past five years. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

Pedestrian Safety group says ‘yes’ to bike yield law — twice

Last month, The City’s Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee — the voice of San Francisco citizens on street safety — unanimously endorsed the controversial Bike Yield Law.

But at last Tuesday’s meeting of the committee, opposition arose to lessen the impact of that endorsement.

The Bike Yield Law, proposed by Supervisor John Avalos, would task the San Francisco Police Department with de-prioritizing ticketing cyclists who treat stop signs as yield signs.

It has drawn fire from many quarters, including motorists, the disability community and most notably Mayor Ed Lee, who has promised to veto the legislation.

With that in mind, the under–the–radar committee found itself amid a broiling controversy. Their most recent meeting was attended by the high–profile Cmdr. Ann Mannix, SFPD’s head of traffic company, as well as Ben Matranga, Vision Zero liaison for the Mayor’s Office.

“We’ve never had any input from the mayor, ever, in any real way,” said Morgan Fitzgibbons, a member of the Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee who supports the bike law.

Yet, Matranga was there Tuesday. During that meeting, committee member Howard Strassner introduced a motion to reaffirm the Bike Yield Law endorsement vote and send it on to the Board of Supervisors, mayor and SFPD, committee members told the San Francisco Examiner.

A vote to not “reaffirm” would signal less confidence in their previous unanimous endorsement of the Bike Yield Law, committee members said.

Fitzgibbons speculated this was a way to potentially circumvent the earlier endorsement.

“They were all there last month, they all voted for it, but this month it was different,” Fitzgibbons said of his fellow committee members. “Somebody must’ve talked to them.”

Indeed, someone did, at least to one member. Committee member John Alex Lowell told the Examiner that Matranga spoke with him to argue the mayor’s view.

“He reached out to me yesterday preceding the meeting,” Lowell said of Matranga.

Lowell also heard from disability advocates who expressed disappointment with his vote supporting the Bike Yield Law in September.

Subsequently, when the pedestrian safety committee took a vote to reaffirm their endorsement, Lowell counted himself among the four “nay” votes, ostensibly siding with the mayor.

Still, that vote passed, 6–4. The endorsement of the Bike Yield Law will be sent to the supervisors and the mayor.

Mannix told the Examiner she spoke to the committee to inform them of the potential consequences of the Bike Yield Law. Nearly 97 percent of SFPD’s ticket violations issued in 2014 were to motorists, she said, two percent of violations were to pedestrians and one percent to cyclists.

Notably, Avalos’ Bike Yield Law calls for ticketing cyclists to be a low SFPD priority.

The SFPD and Mayor’s Office said the Bike Yield Law would make The City’s streets less safe. The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, The Wigg Party, six members of the Board of Supervisors and others say the law will make the streets more safe.

“We’re opposed to it because it’s insane,” Mannix told the Examiner. “Any more chaos on our streets is not a good idea.”

Cyclists disagree.

“At the end of the day, we ask ourselves, ‘Will this make The City safer or not?’” Fitzgibbons said.

“The answer is yes.”

The Bike Yield Law is expected to go before the Board of Supervisors in November.

Just Posted

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. (Courtesy Salesforce)
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins says that she and other members of San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education facing potential recall “represent constituents that are often erased or talked over.” <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Is the Black Cat incident a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor London Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20?<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)</ins>
Club owners to maskless mayor: Are we the new fun police?

Black Cat affair highlights difficult recovery for nightlife industry

BART’s Powell Street station in The City was the site of a fatal accident on Sept. 13.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Powell Station death serves as a grim reminder. BART doors don’t stop for anyone

What you need to know about safety sensors on the trains

Most Read