Opening arguments delivered in 2005 S.F. dog-mauling case

Slain boy’s mother charged with criminal negligence

Nicholas Faibish’s last day on earth will be the subject of close scrutiny over the coming weeks as attorneys square off over whether the 12-year-old boy’s mother was criminally negligent when she left him home alone with two pit bulls that mauled him to death.

In the first day of testimony in Maureen Faibish’s jury trial on charges of felony child endangerment Monday, prosecutor Linda Moore attempted to portray a mother who left her son behind while she attended her daughter’s school picnic, knowing that the family’s two pit bulls, Rex and Ella, might attack him after Rex had bitten him that same morning.

Defense attorney Lidia Stiglich, however, described a family that always had a close relationship with their pets and claimed Maureen Faibish had no reason to think Nicholas was in danger.

Maureen Faibish left the family’s two-bedroom apartment at about 12:45 p.m. on June 3, 2005, after trying to convince Nicholas, who had stayed home from sixth-grade classes at Roosevelt Middle School, to attend his 10-year-old sister Ashley’s school picnic. When she returned, police said, she found the two dogs standing above Nicholas, licking his bloody and mangled body.

Prosecutors contend that Faibish not only knew Nicholas was in danger from the dogs, but also left him in a situation where he would almost certainly encounter them. Nicholas had a learning disability and had difficulty following instructions, Moore claimed in her opening statements. His mother told him to stay in front of the television in the family’s garage and avoid the dogs, but the garage contained no food or working telephone or toilet.

According to San Francisco police Inspector Thomas Walsh, the only access from the garage to the house, where there was food and a toilet, was through the yard and rear bedroom where the dogs were being kept.

Maureen Faibish knew Nicholas was in danger because Ella was in heat and Rex was growing frustrated and territorial, Moore claimed. “Something changed when Ella was in heat and Mrs. Faibish knew it,” she said. “His mother left him alone with those dogs and it cost him his life.”

But Stiglich painted a different picture, one of a family in the stressful process of moving to a new and better life out of state. Maureen Faibish’s husband, Steven, had gotten a new job in Oregon, and the family of five was just days away from moving out of their two-bedroom apartment in San Francisco to a new, three-bedroom house in Oregon.

She said the family’s relationship with their dogs had always been affectionate and smooth. “The dogs loved the kids and the kids loved the dogs. There is nothing that occurred that morning, given the history of the dogs, that would have given any inkling of the horror that would occur,” she said in her opening statement.

If found guilty, Faibish faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Testimony is scheduled to continue today.

amartin@examiner.comBay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted changes to The City's streets including Slow Streets closures to increase open space access and the Shared Spaces program, which allows businesses to use public right-of-ways for dining, retail and services. (Examiner illustration)
COVID is reshaping the streets of San Francisco

Walk down Page Street, which is closed to thru-traffic, and you might… Continue reading

At a rally in February, Monthanus Ratanapakdee, left, and Eric Lawson remember Vicha Ratanapakdee, an 84-year-old Thai man who died after he was pushed to the pavement in San Francisco. (Ekevara Kitpowsong/Examiner file photo)
The criminal justice system can’t fix what’s wrong in our community

My 87-year-old mother walks gingerly, slowly, deliberately, one step in front of… Continue reading

Superintendent Vincent Matthews said some students and families who want to return will not be able to do so at this time. “We truly wish we could reopen schools for everyone,” he said. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD sets April reopening date after reaching tentative agreement with teachers union

San Francisco Unified School District has set April 12 as its reopening… Continue reading

José Victor Luna and Maria Anabella Ochoa, who cite health reasons for continuing distance learning, say they have been enjoying walking in Golden Gate Park with their daughters Jazmin, a first grader, and Jessica, a third grader. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Some SFUSD families prefer distance learning

Health issues, classroom uncertainties among reasons for staying home

Most Read