North Beach Branch Library vote postponed

Votes that could have kicked off hearings into whether the North Beach Branch Library and eight other branch buildings should be protected as historic landmarks were postponed by the Historic Preservation Commission on Wednesday.

Dozens of library officials, users and neighbors waited hours while commissioners waded through their agenda before delaying votes until Oct. 7 on the only items that had drawn significant public interest.

One of the continued items related to the proposed demolition of the North Beach branch building, which is scheduled to close in 2012 after a replacement is built nearby on a parking lot.

Commissioners had been scheduled to vote on whether The City should begin the process of determining whether the North Beach branch and eight other branches designed by the defunct Appleton & Wolfard architecture firm should be listed as historical landmarks, a move that could protect the buildings from demolition or major structural changes.

The commission serves as an advisor to the Board of Supervisors, which is ultimately responsible for determining whether the buildings should be listed as historical landmarks.

But for more than five hours Wednesday, commissioners labored over matters that were scheduled to be discussed but not voted upon, such as building height limits along Market Street and whether space should be set aside in Pier 70 redevelopment plans for artists and light industry.

Eventually, votes on whether the Appleton & Wolfard libraries should be considered for listing as historical landmarks were postponed because the meeting room in City Hall had been booked for a 5 p.m. Police Commission hearing. Votes on the century-old Park branch were postponed to give city consultants more time to conduct research.

The commission secretary indicated early in the meeting that such an outcome was possible if commissioners forged ahead with all of the other discussion items.

The North Beach branch could legally be demolished, even if it’s found to be a historical landmark, if the library applies for a demolition permit before the vote, which was rescheduled for Oct. 7, according to advice provided by the City Attorney’s Office during Wednesday’s hearing.
 

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART study: Ending paper tickets would ‘disproportionately’ impact low-income riders, people of color

When BART eventually eliminates its magnetic-stripe paper tickets from use, it will… Continue reading

Police efforts to stem 49ers revelry in Mission District spark backlash

SFPD preparing for potential bonfires, vandalism on Super Bowl Sunday

First transitional housing project for homeless transgender residents opens in Chinatown

Project gives gender non-conforming a safe, supportive space to rebuild their lives

SF e-scooters burst into flames in Golden Gate Park, ex-contractor reveals

Photographs obtained Wednesday by the San Francisco Examiner show the charred remains of at least two Skip e-scooters

SF politico who authored vape ban takes money from JUUL lobbyist, returns it after media call

Supervisor Shamann Walton made national news after he proverbially smoked e-cigarette company… Continue reading

Most Read