Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner 2012 File PhotoThe San Francisco Planning Commission unanimously voted Thursday that changing the disposal site for The City's waste to the Recology Hay Road Landfill in Solano County will not require an environmental impact report.

Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner 2012 File PhotoThe San Francisco Planning Commission unanimously voted Thursday that changing the disposal site for The City's waste to the Recology Hay Road Landfill in Solano County will not require an environmental impact report.

New site for SF waste will not require environmental impact report

Transporting 1,100 tons of waste collected from San Francisco residents an additional 2,000 miles daily will not have a significant impact on the environment.

That's according to the San Francisco Planning Commission, which unanimously voted Thursday that changing the disposal site for San Francisco's waste from the Altamont Landfill in Alameda County to the Recology Hay Road Landfill in unincorporated Solano County will not require an environmental impact report. The proposal calls for Recology to transport up to 5 million tons of waste to the Hay Road site under a contract that would expire in 13 to 15 years depending on how long it takes to reach 5 million tons.

The commission upheld the Planning Department's decision to prepare a negative declaration as required by the California Environmental Quality Act for projects not expected to result in significant environmental impacts.

In its preliminary negative declaration published March 4, the department studied potential traffic and air quality impacts for the new site and concluded the move would not pose a significant strain on the environment.

“The impacts of this project would be well below established air controls for significant impact,” said Paul Maltzer, a senior planner with the department. “When a project has no significant [environmental] impact, the negative declaration is the correct document.”

But Josh Levine, an attorney for the Solano County Orderly Growth Committee that in April appealed the Planning Department's decision, said the sheer amount of waste expected to be trucked to Solano County is troublesome.

“This project will increase the amount of [carbon dioxide] that's put in the atmosphere every year because you're taking an extra 40-mile roundtrip with each garbage truck every day, which is going to translate to 600,000 miles,” Levine said. “That is added to greenhouse emissions; that's got to be taken into account.”

Jack Macy, commercial zero waste coordinator for the San Francisco Department of the Environment, contended that less waste will actually be brought to the Solano County landfill in that time because Recology and The City are developing programs to recover significant trash components such as textiles and recyclables.

“We are confident that disposal will not increase over the course of this project,” Macy said.

The City's current contract with Waste Management, which operates the Altamont Landfill, will expire by 2016 based on the rate of disposal.

The City opted to switch to Recology's landfill after seeking bids for new sites in 2009. The Recology site will cost ratepayers about $13 million a year less than Waste Management's bid, said Eric Potashner, vice president and senior director of strategic affairs for Recology.

The agreement between San Francisco and Recology to change the disposal sites must still be approved by the Board of Supervisors. It is not expected to alter service for ratepayers.

Correction: The name of the commercial zero waste coordinator for the San Francisco Department of the Environment was incorrect in the original version of this story. That position is held by Jack Macy.

Bay Area NewsRecologySan Francisco Planning CommissionWaste Management

Just Posted

San Franciscans are likely to have the opportunity to vote in four different elections in 2022. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Electionpalooza: SF school board recall will kick off a flurry of local races

‘It’s going to be a lot of elections and a lot of decisions for voters to make’

Four young politicos were elected to city government on the Peninsula in 2020. From left: Redwood City councilmember Michael Smith; South San Francisco councilmember James Coleman; Redwood City councilmember Lissette Espinoza-Garnica; and East Palo Alto councilmember Antonio Lopez. (Examiner illustration/Courtesy photos)
Progressive politicians rise to power on the Peninsula. Will redistricting reverse the trend?

‘There’s this wave of young people really trying to shake things up’

The fate of San Francisco nicotine giant Juul remains to be seen, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is reviewing whether to allow certain flavored vape products on the market. <ins>(Jeenah Moon/New York Times)</ins>
How the vape king of teen nicotine addiction rose and fell in San Francisco

‘Hey, Juul, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Cabernet sauvignon grapes sat in a container after being crushed at Smith-Madrone Winery in St. Helena. (Courtesy Smith-Madrone Winery)
San Francisco’s ‘Champagne problems’ — Wine industry suffers supply chain woes

‘Everywhere you turn, things that were easy are no longer easy’

The Nudge is a startup that points users who sign up for text notifications to fun experiences and buzzworthy places. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
The ‘anti-startup’ aims to get people off their phones and into the world

‘I realized actually doing things made me happy’

Most Read