New legislation would mean tighter control over PG&E’s actions

Until recently, if there was a problem with a large gas pipeline — say, if it was likely to rupture in an earthquake — the only people who would know would be a handful of Pacific Gas & Electric engineers.

And if the utility corporation asked the state for permission to raise rates to pay to fix that problem, and then decided to wait a few years to do that, it never had to inform the state of that decision.

All that could change with legislation introduced Monday, which would tighten regulatory control over California’s utilities in the wake of the devastating explosion of a gas transmission pipeline in San Bruno on Sept. 9. That explosion and the fire it set killed eight people and destroyed dozens of homes.

The cause is still unknown and under investigation by federal officials, but nonetheless the event has inspired careful scrutiny of the utility’s practices and its relationship with its regulator, the California Public Utilities Commission.

The legislation, introduced by State Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, would require a number of things from PG&E, which has a monopoly over almost all of Northern California, and the handful of other utilities in the state.

Any pipeline problems identified, and any conditions requiring repair, would have to be reported to the CPUC each year under the new legislation. And if a project was used as a reason to increase rates, the CPUC would be required to track that project to ensure it happens on time. If it doesn’t, PG&E must make a public filing justifying the change.

Utilities would be required to prioritize pipeline projects near seismically unstable areas.

Ratepayers would also be protected from having to pick up the costs of problems stemming from negligence by the utility — instead, the money would come from PG&E’s profits. PG&E would also be required to pay any penalties or fines assessed by CPUC out of profits, rather than ratepayer funds.

The legislation would also require utilities to install automatic or remote shutoff valves on pipelines where it’s technically feasible, and upgrade pipelines to allow modern inspections.

Mindy Spatt, spokeswoman for The Utility Reform Network, said she had not seen the legislation, but said the agency “strongly agrees that ratepayers should not be held responsible for this explosion” and that costs associated with the explosion should come from profits.

“We know that PG&E has huge profits, and with their profits should come some responsibility,” she said.

PG&E officials said they were reviewing Hill’s legislation.

“We’re committed to working with Assemblyman Hill and other legislators to develop and pass robust pipeline safety legislation,” said spokesman Denny Boyles.

kworth@sfexaminer.com

 

Under control

 Legislation proposed Monday would impose much stricter regulations on PG&E and other utilities in the state.

 

Inspections: All pipelines would be modernized by 2020 to allow for modern corrosion inspections.

Pipeline problems: Utilities must prepare annual reports regarding any pipeline problems and any conditions requiring repair.

Penalties from profits:</b> Utilities would have to pay for fees and penalties out of their own profits, not from ratepayer money.

Emergency education: Starting 2012, utilities must educate the public about their emergency response plans.

Earthquake zones: Pipelines near seismically active areas would be given more safety oversight.

Quick shutdowns: Automatic or remote shutoff valves would be required where technically feasible.

Tracking fixes: Regulators will track projects that PG&E receives rate hikes for. When the money is diverted to a different project, the utility must make a public filing justifying the change.

Bay Area NewsLocalSan BrunoSan Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Although The City has been shut down and largely empty, people have enjoyed gathering in places such as Dolores Park. <ins>(Al Saracevic/The Examiner)</ins>
Come back to San Francisco: The City needs you now

Time to get out of the house, people. The City’s been lonely… Continue reading

A surveillance camera outside Macy’s at Union Square on Tuesday, July 28, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Is the tide turning against surveillance cameras in SF?

Crime-fighting camera networks are springing up in commercial areas all around San… Continue reading

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott speaks alongside Mayor London Breed at a news conference about 2019 crime statistics at SFPD headquarters on Jan. 21, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What the media gets wrong about crime in San Francisco

By Lincoln Mitchell Special to The Examiner Seemingly every day now, you… Continue reading

Vice President Kamala Harris is under fire for her comments in Guatemala earlier this week. (Examiner file photo.)
SF immigration advocates slam Kamala Harris’ ‘betrayal’ to her past

Kamala Harris’ comments earlier this week discouraging Central Americans from traveling to… Continue reading

Youth activists with the Sunrise Movement march along a rural road during their two-week trek from Paradise to San Francisco to call attention to an increase in deadly wildfires as a result of climate change on June 2, 2021. (Photo by Brooke Anderson)
Weeks-long climate march culminates on the Golden Gate Bridge

Lola’s alarm goes off most mornings before dawn. The 17-year-old high school… Continue reading

Most Read