Nevin blames Papan for state Senate seat loss

In the wake of Assemblyman Leland Yee’s victory in the contentious state Senate 8th District Democratic primary, opponent Mike Nevin and some political observers are attributing his win to the “spoiler” effect of candidate and former Assemblyman Lou Papan.

Yee, a former San Francisco supervisor, who would be the first Chinese-American to win election to the state Senate should he win in November, was able to walk away with the race because Papan drew votes from former Supervisor Mike Nevin in his home county of San Mateo, according to one pollster.

“[Papan’s] presence in the race made it very difficult for Mike Nevin to win, whether it was intentional or unintentional,” said Ben Tulchin, an independent pollster for Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research.

It is an argument Nevin has made. He has attributed Papan’s candidacy in part to a long-running feud between the two of them dating back at least five years.

“[Papan] is a bitter guy, and his entry into the race changed the dynamics, because I would have been able to concentrate in San Francisco, but instead I had to spend money and time in San Mateo covering my base,” Nevin said Wednesday.

“Clearly [Nevin] is upset about the outcome of the race,” Papan said, denying he entered as a spoiler. “He’s been making the same excuse since he started.”

Indeed, if one does the math, Nevin could have edged out Yee, but would have needed nearly 100 percent of Papan’s vote, according to elections figures.

Yee won the race to replace state Sen. Jackie Speier, D-San Francisco/San Mateo, for the District 8 seat — which encompasses the western half of San Francisco south to San Mateo and Belmont — with 37,637 votes or 49.7 percent, while Nevin garnered 27,704 or 36.6 percent. Papan managed 10,447, or 13.7 percent.

Yee campaign consultant Jim Stearns called the chance that Nevin would have won 100 percent of Papan’s votes “illogical.”

Instead, San Mateo County voters would have in all likelihood split along lines similar to Tuesday’s results, with Nevin taking about 43 percent and Yee winning 36 percent, still not enough for a Nevin victory, he said.

“In the end, voters looked past endorsements to pick the candidate who had a record of accomplishment on health care, education and environment,” Stearns said.

ecarpenter@examiner.com

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read