Mullin: It’s time to rethink policies on redevelopment

Debate on eminent domain calls into question structure of 60-year-old agency

As the debate over the use of eminent domain continues in court cases and on the upcoming ballot, Assemblyman Gene Mullin, D-South San Francisco, feels now is the time to see whether city redevelopment agencies are still functioning as designed.

In 1945, California passed the Redevelopment Act, which allows cities to create such agencies to transform blighted areas into new sites that serve the public good, including schools, roads, housing and — more recently — commercial sites that provide substantial tax revenues to city coffers. Nearly 60 years later, Mullin thinks the structure deserves serious analysis.

“It wouldn’t hurt to take reappraisal and see if there’s some readjustment that could be made, or whether some other type of structure would work better,” Mullin said. “It’s an open question.”

Mullin, chair of the Assembly’s Housing and Community Development Commission, hasn’t established a wish list of proposed changes.

His thirst for re-examination has been sparked in part by state Senator Christine Kehoe’s pending eminent domain bill, which would require redevelopment agencies to “spell out when, where and how local officials will use eminent domain to condemn property,” according to Peter Detwiler, consultant for the Senate’s Local Government Committee.

Each year, redevelopment projects generate approximately $32billion in economic activity and create 310,000 jobs, according to John Shirey, director of the California Redevelopment Association. Each dollar a city spends on redevelopment earns roughly $14.

Redevelopment has occurred all across the Peninsula, creating landmarks such as the cluster of biotechnology firms in South San Francisco and revitalizing downtown areas in San Mateo and, soon, Redwood City.

Officials in those cities see some opportunities to improve the redevelopment laws.

“I think some aspects, like eminent domain, have been abused, but the legislature is trying to deal with those abuses by making changes,” San Mateo Community Development Director Bob Beyer said.

Redwood City Mayor Barbara Pierce thinks it’s important for redevelopment agencies to become more sensitive and responsive to community values when redeveloping a site.

“We have to be careful about taking the next step and imagining, ‘If we make this change, what will the impact be?’” she said.

Teaching citizens what redevelopment agencies are and what they do would be helpful in defusing often emotional debates about the agencies’ activities, Shirey said.

Mullin said he would like to enable redevelopment agencies to prevent blight before it “hits bottom.”

“Maybe one of the roles could be to intervene and reverse it, if possible,” he said.

bwinegarner@examiner.com

Just Posted

HUD secretary calls for increased deregulation after tour of Potrero Hill public housing

Carson calls for greater ‘cooperation’ between local, federal officials but offers no additional funds

Supervisors move to halt closure of long-term mental health beds

Emergency resolution would put patient relocations on hold while officials wrangle over facility

Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence may pull out of Folsom Street Fair

San Francisco’s iconic Folsom Street Fair could soon see a high-profile departure:… Continue reading

SF to form task force to address drug dealing in Tenderloin, SoMa

As the supervisor of the Tenderloin and SoMa neighborhood, Matt Haney said… Continue reading

Punch Line celebrates with ‘New Lease on Laughs’

Savvy Nato Green and friends save comedy club from eviction

Most Read