A statue of Junipero Serra at the Golden Gate Park Music Concourse was toppled by protesters on June 20, 2020. Serra, a key figure in the Mission movement, is blamed for the enslavement and death of Indigenous peoples in California. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)

The fates of dozens of city statues are under review amid calls to reconsider the past

City officials have begun reviewing San Francisco’s statues and monuments to decide on their fates amid renewed calls for racial justice.

Authorities are considering whether to keep or remove 94 memorials and monuments in the civic arts collection, artwork created to honor a person or an event. The review is being conducted in response to a directive issued by Mayor London Breed last month after the removal of a Christopher Columbus statue and the destruction of several other statues by protesters in Golden Gate Park.

“This is a really important and I think very exciting opportunity to look at our old memorials and what we want to see represented in The City in the future,” said Dorka Keehn, a commissioner at the San Francisco Arts Commission, at a meeting last week.

City staff are gathering information about the artwork: The background of the artist, how the artworks were acquired and the ways communities have responded to the monuments. And the Arts Commission will develop a set of criteria to help officials assess each statue, Keehn said. The guidelines will be considered by the Board of Supervisors to implement a citywide ordinance,

According to Rachelle Axel, a spokesperson for the Arts Commission, any pieces that are removed could be stored or loaned long-term, gifted to another cultural institution or sold publicly. The commission will vote on the items as it has jurisdiction over the statues.

The City’s statues have come under renewed scrutiny in the midst of ongoing protests about police brutality and racism. Last month, a city crew removed a statue of Christopher Columbus near Coit Tower under Breed’s direction after word spread of a protest that aimed to topple it. In Golden Gate Park, during a day of Juneteenth protests, people knocked over statues of Father Junipero Serra, Ulysses S. Grant and Francis Scott Key, and vandalized others.

San Francisco is working to determine what to do with dozens of statues after protesters removed several including one of Francis Scott Key in Golden Gate Park’s Music Concourse. The pedestal where Key once stood now sits empty. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)

These statues are among those now being evaluated.

“The toppling of these statues is evocative of the decades and generation-long dissatisfaction with the status quo of living in the U.S., but also more broadly in the western world,” said James Zarsadiaz, an associate professor of history at University of San Francisco.

“Part of the reason why cities are so important to social movements is because of the collective mass of people,” he continued. “When you have a space or place where people can gather even during the pandemic, it brings attention to major political or social issues.”

Other artworks under review also include figures such as William Shakespeare, Leonardo da Vinci and George Washington.

City officials will also analyze the costs of removing and storing artworks that are deemed inappropriate. The price tag for the removal and storage of the Columbus statue alone is $110,000. It is currently in temporary storage, which costs about $500 a month, according to Allison Cummings, senior registrar at the Arts Commission.

While people have expressed interest in seeing the Columbus statue, the public cannot access it as the location is confidential for security reasons, Keehn said.

She added that the Arts Commission is working with the Human Rights Commission and the Recreation and Parks Department to organize discussions with community members.

“There are no angels among humanity. And I think we can have an open and honest debate about any figures …,” said Gregory Downs, a professor of history at the University of California, Davis. “Memorials certainly change. That’s a part of human history. The hope that I have is that those processes — whether it’s changing names or removing memorials and especially making new ones — amplifies our ability to seriously think about our past.”

A statue of Christopher Columbus was removed from its site at Coit Tower early June 18, 2020, after word circulated that protesters were planning to target it for possible removal. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)

Sirron Norris, a San Francisco-based artist who has worked on public murals, said it’s crucial for the public to have the opportunity to speak outside of the two-minute time allocated for speakers during a commission meeting.

The public also needs to be informed about The City’s research on the statues, he added, in order for people to have productive discussions.

He urged Breed to join the discussions about the fate of The City’s statues.

“This isn’t just about art or the Arts Commission. This is about San Francisco. This is our moment of being leaders in this world,” Norris said.

Zarsadiaz said that the discussion and voting process should include people of different ethnicities, generations and political beliefs. People with various professions such as environmentalists, preservationists and educators should also be involved.

“You [need] to have a diverse group of people by race, class, gender and generation because everyone has a different understanding of who and what are important to remember,” Zarsadiaz said.

He added that The City’s statues should include figures who should be given much more priority in the history of the United States, people like W.E.B. Du Bois, a civil rights activist who was one of the founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and Yuri Kochiyama, a lifelong activist who was incarcerated in a Japanese internment camp in the U.S.



nchan@sfexaminer.com

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

A lab worker from the Medical Examiner’s Office was arrested with an evidence bag of methamphetamine in August. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Audit over lab worker meth arrest finds medical examiner is missing drugs

An audit of the Medical Examiner’s Office prompted by the arrest of… Continue reading

City officials argue that the dominance of a few third-party delivery services gives them disproportionate leverage against restaurants. (Courtesy photo)
Cap on food delivery app fees may remain until indoor dining allowed at full capacity

Proposal seen as financial relief for restaurants struggling in pandemic

The City is seeking to enhance health care for San Francisco International Airport workers, which include more than 100 who have tested positive for COVID-19. <ins>(Courtesy photo)</ins>
Airlines, business groups fight new health insurance requirements for SFO workers

Heathy Airport Ordinance would require companies to offer family coverage or increase contributions

The Hall of Justice building at 850 Bryant St. is notorious for sewage leaks and is known to be seismically unsafe. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFPD speeding up Hall of Justice exit after another ‘large leak’

San Francisco police can’t get out of the decrepit Hall of Justice… Continue reading

The main entrance to Laguna Honda Hospital and Rehabilitation Center on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Voting rights of seniors, disabled must be protected

Coronavirus pandemic adds new challenges for accessing the polls

Most Read