Medicinal pot club permit deadline extended

Having just a doctor’s note could soon allow San Francisco’s medicinal pot clubs to roll out the welcome mats for your patronage.

Two years ago, the Board of Supervisors adopted groundbreaking legislation that established the first-ever regulations on medicinal marijuana dispensaries. Under state law, medicinal marijuana is legal, but it remains illegal under federal law.

The regulations came as an increasing number of pot clubs set up shop in San Francisco, causing residents to complain that the clubs were operating too close to one another and attracting drug dealing and other criminal activity.

The regulations set a deadline of July 1 for existing pot clubs to obtain a city permit to operate legally or be forced to close down — while no new clubs could open. But to date, no clubs have obtained a permit, prompting members of the board to revisit the regulations and propose significant changes.

The Board of Supervisors City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee adopted on Thursday a number of amendments to the regulations, including a nine-month extension, until March 2008, for existing clubs to obtain permits.

The extension was in response to The City’s inability to process the permits in time to meet the deadline, due to the number of applicants as well as the cumbersome permitting process.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who authored the original pot club regulations, also proposed an amendment to allow patients to obtain marijuana if they have a verifiable doctor’s prescription. The regulation currently would require clubs to sell pot to only those patients with a state-issued medicinal marijuana identification card, which are costly and often time-consuming to obtain.

The amendments were widely praised by medicinal marijuana advocates. A few residents, however, were upset by the permit extension. Thea Selby, who lives on the 400 block of Haight Street, said there is “direct connection between these clubs and homicides” and faulted the proposed extension for allowing the “bad clubs” to remain open.

Mirkarimi said the regulations are already working given that there were 42 clubs at the time the regulations were adopted and now there are 31. The board committee will hold an Aug. 9 hearing on the amended regulations, when it is expected to send them to the full board for a vote.

jsabatini@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Folks wave from the side of a Muni cable car as it heads down Powell Street after cable car service returns from a 16-month COVID absence on Monday, Aug. 2, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
San Francisco’s cable cars return after 16-month absence

San Francisco’s cable cars are back, and they’re free for passengers to… Continue reading

Blue California often is the target of criticism by conservative media, but now is receiving critical attention from liberal writers. Pictured: The State Capitol. (Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters)
Why is California now being criticized from the left?

California being what it is – a very large state with a… Continue reading

Tiffany Carter, owner of Boug Cali West Coast Creole Shack in San Francisco’s La Cocina Marketplace, was dismayed by gentrification she found when she returned to her hometown to start a business. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF Black Wallstreet: Helping residents build wealth, reclaim spaces they’ve had to leave

Tiffany Carter moved back to her hometown of San Francisco five years… Continue reading

Steven Buss, left, and Sachin Agarwal co-founded Grow SF, which plans to produce election voter guides offering a moderate agenda. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Grow SF: New tech group aims to promote moderate ideals to political newcomers

Sachin Agarwal has lived in San Francisco for 15 years. But the… Continue reading

Most Read