Legal effort to strike parking initiative fails

A legal motion to remove a controversial parking initiative off the November ballot was rejected Thursday by a San Francisco Superior Court judge.

Public transit advocate Tom Radulovich, a BART board director, sued to remove Measure H — an initiative that would increase the number of parking spaces allowed per residential unit built in The City.

The lawsuit argued that a factual error on the petition that qualified the measure for the ballot invalidated every signature collected. The petition summary, prepared by the City Attorney’s Office, understated the amount of parking permitted in certain downtown zoning districts — stating that up to one space for every three units was permitted, when in downtown residential districts up to one car for each unit is permitted.

“The voters are deciding on something that reached the ballot on false pretenses,” said Michael Sweet, the lawyer handling the lawsuit.

On Thursday, the City Attorney’s Office acknowledged the error.

“Our position is that the error was immaterial,” City Attorney spokesperson Matt Dorsey said. “At the same time, we acknowledge that it is an important principle for voters to have a right to accurate information.”

Superior Court Judge Peter Busche denied the request, noting that the ballot language itself would not contain the error.

The hearing was the latest scuffle in an ongoing battle over the parking measure, which has pitted downtown business interests and public-transit supporters.

Earlier this month, Supervisor Aaron Peskin — who put a Muni charter amendment on the November ballot that includes a provision that would negate the parking measure — agreed to a compromise measure that will follow on the February 2008 ballot. In return, Measure H backers agreed to not campaign for the pro-parking initiative.

Peskin’s compromise allows for at least one parking space for each housing unit constructed in the western part of The City; it also allows developers to build parking garages in the South of Market area, west of Sixth Street.

beslinger@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocalTransittransportation

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The admissions process at the academically competitive Lowell High School is set to change this year due to coronavirus restritions. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Lowell’s selective admissions process put on hold this year — and more changes may be in the works

School board votes unanimously to use normal student assignment lottery for competitive school

Dr. Vincent Matthews, superintendent of the San Francisco Unified School District, said Tuesday that student would not be back in school before the end of this calendar year. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Superintendent: City schools will not reopen before the end of the year

San Francisco public schools won’t reopen to students for the rest of… Continue reading

San Francisco has failed to reduce traffic deaths enough to meet its Vision Zero goal. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco not on track to meet Vision Zero goals by 2024

Hamstrung by state laws, dwindling budget and limited resources, SFMTA tries to chart path forward

San Francisco will allow bars selling drinks, and not food, to begin serving customers outdoors under health guidelines going into effect next month. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF becomes first Bay Area County to move to least restrictive COVID-19 category

Change to ‘yellow’ will allow more indoor dining and fitness, reopening non-essential offices

City officials want to install more red light cameras but the process is costly and time consuming. (Shutterstock)
Transit officials push for more red light cameras

SFMTA says ‘capital crunch’ and dragging timelines make expanding the program cumbersome

Most Read