Lawmakers eyeing update of utility tax

City leaders are gauging residents’ support for a 24-year-old utility tax, in part because updating the tax to avoid legal trouble could require voter approval.

Redwood City’s utility users tax, created in 1983 by the City Council, assesses a 5 percent levy on gas, electricity, cable television and telephone use, both landlines and cellular. While it was enacted with no specific purpose, city leaders agreed to use the funds — which total $8.8 million this year — for capital projects.

Since then, the tax has helped fund projects including new fire and police stations, a new library in Redwood Shores, restoration of the Red Morton Community Center and construction of the Courthouse Plaza, Finance Director Brian Ponty said.

Cities often create utility taxes because they are considered among the most fair. Residents with more income naturally wind up using more utilities and hence pay more in taxes, while those with less income pay less, Ponty said.

However, cities such as Palo Alto have wound up paying hefty settlements to cell phone companies because their utility-tax laws have not been updated to reflect wireless technology. Redwood City hopes to update its own rules before it runs into similar trouble from companies that claim the tax is calculated in ways that are unfair to their customers.

In addition, residents and businesses are using technology like Internet connectivity to skirt the phone system — and wind up skirting the tax, according to Jeff Ira, a member of the City Council’s finance subcommittee.

“When it was written, we had no idea where the technology would go,” Ira said. “We want to write something that’s more broad and open so it’s fair to everyone.” Doing so could require a vote of the public, he added.

That’s why phone surveyors are now calling Redwood City homes to gauge support for the tax. Results should be available by mid-June.

“The tax is pretty important, as far as capital improvement projects, but the city needs to demonstrate what it’s used for and why it should continue,” said resident and former Mayor Judy Buchan.

Tax naysayers, however, have worked hard to reduce or remove such taxes — and succeeded in getting Portola Valley’s utility tax halved, according to resident Jack Hickey.

“Utilities are a necessity, like food, and at least food is not taxable,” Hickey said. “Cities adopt a tax like this for a specific circumstance, but it’s not supposed to be a permanent thing.”

bwinegarner@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

Just Posted

A collaborative workspace for a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) in Coordinape is pictured at a recent blockchain meet up at Atlas Cafe. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Business without bosses: San Francisco innovators battle bureaucracy with blockchain

‘The next generation will work for three DAOs at the same time’

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
Plan Bay Area 2050: Analyzing an extensive regional plan that covers the next 30 years

Here are the big ticket proposals in the $1.4 trillion proposal

Pregnant women are in the high-risk category currently prioritized for booster shots in San Francisco. (Unai Huizi/Shutterstock)
What pregnant women need to know about COVID and booster shots

Inoculations for immunosuppressed individuals are recommended in the second trimester

Examiner reporter Ben Schneider drives an Arcimoto Fun Utility Vehicle along Beach Street in Fisherman’s Wharf on Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Could San Francisco’s tiny tourist cruisers become the cars of the future?

‘Fun Utility Vehicles’ have arrived in The City

Most Read