Demonstrators gather at San Francisco City Hall on May 8, 2015, asking lawmakers for a moratorium on evictions and market-rate housing development in the Mission district. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

Demonstrators gather at San Francisco City Hall on May 8, 2015, asking lawmakers for a moratorium on evictions and market-rate housing development in the Mission district. (Mike Koozmin/S.F. Examiner)

Latinos to decide who to be pawns of

Nato Green Column Header

San Francisco’s working-class Latinos have a veritable catch 22 before them: Do they want to continue to be pawns of white NIMBY homeowners or instead become pawns of white real estate developers?

The question resurfaced last week because of a mangled Milton Friedman fan fiction in The Atlantic about housing in San Francisco by a Venice Beach writer, upset about “… property owners gleefully watching the value of their biggest assets skyrocket as they aggressively blocked high-density development. Their success has caused much misery … They’d prevail by tricking economically illiterate activists into allying with them after sneakily tearing the supply-and-demand chapters from their econ textbooks.”

(Disclosure: I am a property owner, although I’ve never been called gleeful.)

So property owners, like me, tricked blue-collar saps into trying to slow displacement by opposing high-density development, restricting supply and increasing our property values. It’s the simplest diabolical scheme of all time. According to the writer, unchecked high-density development is the “only viable policy fix” for housing. If Latino “illiterates” of the Mission weren’t tricked, they would support developments like the Monster in the Mission instead of opposing them. Homeowners, like me, excel at trickery.

Some version of this same argument is routinely made in the press, in neoliberal thinkpieces, at hearings, by callers to Michael Krasny and on Twitter. It’s popular among people who support more development. It’s also racist.

It’s racist because it implies that white homeowners are rational political actors pursuing their self-interest and renters of color are not. The fabled middle- and upper-class white NIMBYs who allegedly control land use across the Bay Area, in this narrative, have rational priorities: property values, views, traffic, parking, and “neighborhood character,” which is a thing, and subjective.

Politicians pander to such voters and fear their backlash, although they occasionally frustrate deep-pocketed donors. This is why I support high-density housing in Saint Francis Woods. It would be walking distance to Muni metro lines and to Google bus stops on 19th Avenue. Yet, despite being perfect, the notion is so far out of the question politically — because that neighborhood would not tolerate it — that it is not even imagined let alone proposed or attempted.

On the other hand, we have seen how swiftly a consensus congeals from City Hall to my favorite source of scratch-n-sniff journalism, the Chronicle, to construction unions and astrotuf groups, in support of proposals in less affluent neighborhoods to build stuff local residents don’t want. And when the Mission resists luxury condos, the argument goes, it’s not because of self-interest but because they’re causing their own misery and don’t understand economics — and the Mission is already dead, anyway.

Instead of being pawns of homeowners, they should submit to being pawns of real estate developers to build more market-rate housing.

The possibility that working-class Latinos are not stupid does not enter these discussions. The people telling San Francisco’s remaining poor communities that they’ve been tricked are effectively telling them they’re stupid and should yield to benevolent white men in suits.

It is possible that struggling renters have not been tricked, but may have cause to doubt their interests are aligned with luxury condo developers. Or don’t believe they will ever get to live in those condos. Or suspect that developers build when it is profitable and would stop building long before low-income people get relief.

The poor are never as profitable as the rich.

Or believe that dropping a lot of rich people into a poor neighborhood never works out well for the poor people. There is a long history in the Americas of white newcomers promising the natives riches and delivering destruction instead. I’m not saying high-density proponents are conquistadores with tablets. I’m not not saying that. I am definitely saying no one who builds a political argument around the premise that low-income people cannot understand the world they live in should be taken seriously.

Nato Green is a San Francisco-based comedian who will host Iron Comic at SF Sketchfest on Jan. 24 at Cobb’s with Moshe Kasher, Janeane Garofalo, Dana Gould, Greg Behrendt, Guy Branum and Brandon Wardell. Holler @natogreen.

Google bushousingLatinosNato GreenSan Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Advocates with the San Francisco Public Bank Coalition hold a rally outside City Hall before the Board of Supervisors were to vote on a resolution supporting the creation of a public banking charter on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Should San Francisco run its own public bank? The debate returns

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Apprenticeship instructor Mike Miller, center, demonstrates how to set up a theodolite, a hyper-sensitive angle measuring device, for apprentices Daniel Rivas, left, Ivan Aguilar, right, and Quetzalcoatl Orta, far right, at the Ironworkers Local Union 377 training center in Benicia on June 10, 2021. (Photo by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters)
California’s affordable housing crisis: Are labor union requirements in the way?

By Manuela Tobias CalMatters California lawmakers introduced several bills this year that… Continue reading

People fish at a dock at Islais Creek Park on Thursday, June 10, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What Islais Creek tells us about rising sea levels in San Francisco

Islais Creek is an unassuming waterway along San Francisco’s eastern industrial shoreline,… Continue reading

Organizer Jas Florentino, left, explains the figures which represent 350 kidnapped Africans first sold as slaves in the United States in 1619 in sculptor Dana King’s “Monumental Reckoning.” The installation is in the space of the former Francis Scott Key monument in Golden Gate Park. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
What a reparations program would look like in The City

‘If there’s any place we can do it, it’s San Francisco’

Officer Joel Babbs, pictured at a protest outside the Hall of Justice in 2017, is representing himself in an unusually public police misconduct matter. <ins>(Courtesy Bay City News)</ins>
The strange and troubling story of Joel Babbs: What it tells us about the SFPD

The bizarre and troubling career of a whistle-blowing San Francisco police officer… Continue reading

Most Read