(Natasha Dangond/Special to S.F. Examiner file photo)

Judge temporarily blocks SF law restricting short-term rentals

A federal judge said in San Francisco on Thursday that he will temporarily block a new city law that prohibits rental booking services such as Airbnb Inc. from collecting fees for rentals of unregistered units.

U.S. District Judge James Donato said, “I’m disappointed with both sides” for not having agreed on an efficient way to determine whether homeowners wanting to provide short-term rentals had registered their units with The City.

SEE RELATED: Supes approve 60-day cap on Airbnb rentals

“You haven’t worked hard enough,” Donato told lawyers for The City and online booking services Airbnb and HomeAway Inc.

“This can be solved. This is not an insoluble issue,” he said.

Donato said he would issue a temporary restraining order later Thursday that will bar The City from enforcing the law.

Meanwhile, he ordered lawyers from both sides to meet with a federal magistrate next month to try to come up with an agreement.

The new law was enacted by The City’s Board of Supervisors in August. It makes it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 for a rental booking service to collect a fee if the unit being rented has not been registered with The City.

San Francisco-based Airbnb and Austin, Texas-based HomeAway sued the city, claiming that the measure violates their constitutional right of free speech and also violates the U.S. Communications Decency Act by treating them as publishers.

Last week, Donato rejected those arguments, saying that the law regulated conduct, not speech, and declined to issue a preliminary injunction suspending the law until a full trial is held.

But he said that a third question was still unresolved. That issue is whether The City has an effective system that would enable the services to determine whether an owner has registered a unit for short-term rentals.

Deputy City Attorney Sara Eisenberg told the judge that the services could use an online property map to see whether properties were registered and also said that a fully automated system is “in process.”

The attorneys for Airbnb and HomeAway said they want the judge to issue a final preliminary injunction immediately so that they can take their challenge to the law to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

James Grant, a lawyer for HomeAway, said Donato’s order for an attempt at an agreement “doesn’t change that we challenge the ordinance.”

“An appeal is inevitable. We still think the law is invalid,” he said.

Donato said, “I know you want to appeal, but we’re not going to do that yet. You are going to try harder to work this out.”Politics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Newsom orders indoor uses in gyms, salons, malls, churches, more to close

California is largely closing again amid a spike in coronavirus cases across… Continue reading

Haney secures needed support to ask voters to create street cleaning department

Public Advocate proposal also advances toward ballot as anti-corruption measure

Riders should expect big changes when Muni rail returns in August

Reconfigured routes will mean fewer, longer trains through tunnel

Californians to vote on restoring voting rights of parolees

If passed, Proposition 17 would amend the California Constitution and allow parolees to vote

New audio of couple calling police on SF man bolsters racial bias claims, supe says

Pacific Heights incident spurred CAREN Act to outlaw discriminatory reports to police

Most Read