Judge rejects NRA challenge of San Francisco gun restrictions

AP File PhotoVictorious: City Attorney Dennis Herrera touted a U.S. District Court judge’s decision as a good step for public safety.

AP File PhotoVictorious: City Attorney Dennis Herrera touted a U.S. District Court judge’s decision as a good step for public safety.

San Francisco is claiming a legal victory over the National Rifle Association, but an attorney for the group says its fight against local gun control laws is just beginning.

A 2007 city law — strengthened by then-Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi in 2011 — compels gun owners to “safely store” firearms in their homes and generally requires them to use trigger locks. A 1994 ordinance outlawed possession of “particularly dangerous ammunition” such as fragmenting bullets and expanding bullets with “no sporting purpose.”

The NRA first went after the restrictions in 2009, but on Monday, a U.S. District Court judge ruled that the group’s lawyers had failed to prove the restrictions inhibit constitutional rights to bear arms. As a result, an injunction sought by the NRA was not granted.

“This is a thoughtful and persuasive ruling that affirms our position that San Francisco’s gun laws protect public safety in a manner that’s reasonable and constitutional,” City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement.

NRA attorney C.D. Michel said his group will appeal.

“This is not over, not by a long shot,” he said. “What if you’re old and need glasses in the middle of the night, or you have kids at home to protect? Why are they being forced to keep their guns locked up?”

The case — Espanola Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco — is one of several cases the NRA hopes will eventually be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The NRA won a $380,000 settlement from The City in 2009 over a voter-approved gun ownership ban for anyone but law enforcement officers and certain security guards. In 2008, Mayor Gavin Newsom defied a court ruling shooting down a law banning handguns in public housing. Later that year, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a similar handgun ban, causing the San Francisco Housing Authority to agree not to enforce it.

dschreiber@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsDennis HerreraGavin NewsomLocal

Just Posted

Pharmacist Hank Chen is known for providing personalized service at Charlie’s Pharmacy in the Fillmore.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Left: A Walgreens at 300 Gough St. is among San Francisco stores closing.
Walgreens closures open the door for San Francisco’s neighborhood pharmacies

‘I think you’ll see more independents start to pop up’

San Franciscans are likely to have the opportunity to vote in four different elections in 2022. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Electionpalooza: SF school board recall will kick off a flurry of local races

‘It’s going to be a lot of elections and a lot of decisions for voters to make’

Four young politicos were elected to city government on the Peninsula in 2020. From left: Redwood City Councilmember Michael Smith; South San Francisco Councilmember James Coleman; Redwood City Councilmember Lissette Espinoza-Garnica; and East Palo Alto Councilmember Antonio Lopez.<ins> (Examiner illustration/Courtesy photos)</ins>
Progressive politicians rise to power on the Peninsula. Will redistricting reverse the trend?

‘There’s this wave of young people really trying to shake things up’

The fate of San Francisco nicotine giant Juul remains to be seen, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is reviewing whether to allow certain flavored vape products on the market. <ins>(Jeenah Moon/New York Times)</ins>
How the vape king of teen nicotine addiction rose and fell in San Francisco

‘Hey, Juul, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Most Read