Public Defender Jeff Adachi had argued Judge Ethan Schulman should not rule on his motion to dismiss murder charges against his client because he alleged the judge was biased. (Courtesy San Francisco Superior Court)

Public Defender Jeff Adachi had argued Judge Ethan Schulman should not rule on his motion to dismiss murder charges against his client because he alleged the judge was biased. (Courtesy San Francisco Superior Court)

Judge denies motion in murder trial

Santa Clara County Judge Linda Clark has thrown out a motion to disqualify a San Francisco Superior Court judge from ruling on a motion related to the murder trial of a tenant rights lawyer, according to the ruling obtained by the San Francisco Examiner.

Public Defender Jeff Adachi had argued Judge Ethan Schulman should not rule on his motion to dismiss murder charges against his client because he alleged the judge was biased against Latinos and criminal defendants.

Although the decision was signed Monday, Adachi said on Friday that he had yet to see the ruling.

“The fact that this decision by an out-of-county judge has been circulated to the media and has not been provided to the party who made the challenge is outrageous,” Adachi said. “The superior court needs to answer for it.”

The news provides yet another twist in the murder case which was already overflowing with complexity, legal maneuverings, and surprises.

In his filing, Adachi cited racially insensitive comments Schulman allegedly made to a Latina defense attorney, Elizabeth Camacho. Camacho said in the motion that Schulman asked her “when is this telenovela going to end?” outside the judge’s chambers, referring to an opening statement she was making at the time in an unrelated case.

“I have been fully and demonstrably committed to equal justice throughout my career, both as a lawyer and as a judge,” Schulman wrote in a response to Adachi, categorically denying the allegations. “I devoted a substantial part of my career as a lawyer to advancing the interests of the Hispanic community.”

Clark wrote in her ruling that the court did not need to determine if Schulman made the statement, because even if he had, it would not have provided grounds for disqualification.

“The telenovela statement described by Ms. Camacho may have been unseemly, racially insensitive or improper – but it does not demonstrate a racial bias that will support blanket recusal of Shulman in other cases involving Latinos two and a half years after it was made,” Clark wrote.

“No reasonable person would question impartiality in this case based on a single comment made in one case out of hundreds, more than two years ago, by a jurist whose work on Latino issues has garnered numerous awards and recognitions,” she continued.

Adachi said he had been calling the court for the past week to determine what the status of his motion was but had received no response.

“To me there’s something shady that’s going on here if supposedly there’s a decision made, and they haven’t had the courtesy to send it to the parties,” he said.

News of the decision comes one day after jurors heard opening arguments Thursday in the murder trial of Carlos Argueta, 34, who is accused of stabbing 61-year-old James “Rick” Thomas to death outside the Tu Lan Vietnamese restaurant at Sixth and Market Streets in 2015.

A different judge previously dismissed the case against Argueta, but a grand jury indicted him on murder charges last year.

Adachi was seeking to prevent Schulman from ruling on a motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment, alleging prosecutor Andrew Ganz misrepresented evidence to the jury in order to obtain the indictment.

“It’s insane that today is Friday, I have not received a copy of it, the court has not returned my phone calls, and we’re in trial,” Adachi said. “I don’t know if this is some kind of strategy on their part not to give us a copy of the decision.”

Adachi said according to statute, he has only 10 calendar days from the date of the decision to file an appeal.

The district attorney’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

“There is no excuse for what’s happened here,” Adachi said. “I’m definitely going to ask to hold whomever is responsible accountable.”

Adachi was elected to his fifth four-year term as public defender on Tuesday, running unopposed.

The trial is scheduled to resume Tuesday morning.Bay Area NewsCrime

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Crab fisherman Skip Ward of Marysville casts his crab net out off a pier near Fort Point. (Craig Lee/Special to The	Examiner)
San Francisco came back to life, and we captured it all

Last spring, in the early days of the pandemic, the bestselling authors… Continue reading

Revelers at Madrone Art Bar in the early hours of June 15, 2021 (Courtesy Power Quevedo).
No social distancing at Motown-themed dance party

‘I don’t care how anyone feels, I just want to dance!’

<em>The San Francisco Peace Pagoda stands tall in between Japan Center East and West malls.</em>
 (Ida Mojadad/The Examiner)
Patrons return to the Japantown mall

‘We’re so happy—it’s really hard to make a profit’

Scenes from an SFO-bound BART train on Tuesday, June 15, 2021, the day California fully reopened for business after the COVID pandemic. (Al Saracevic/SF Examiner)
SF reopens: BART riders dreading the end of the pandemic

‘I’ve forgotten what it’s like to be packed like sardines’

Micael Butial stands as he holds an umbrella that he painted with the words “Stop Asian Hate” at a rally held to show support for Asian and Pacific Islanders communities, Sunday, March 21, 2021 in San Francisco. (Photo by Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Inside the California organization tracking anti-Asian hate incidents

By Mallika Seshadri CalMatters Richard Lim was walking along a quiet sidewalk… Continue reading

Most Read