Judge considering televising Prop. 8 trial

Television cameras could appear in a federal trial court in San Francisco for the first time as early as next week, in a pretrial hearing on
a lawsuit challenging California's same-sex marriage ban.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in an order issued late Wednesday said he is considering allowing recording or webcasting of a Jan. 6
hearing on an experimental basis.

Walker wrote that a review of the video would “be helpful to the court in deciding whether to permit recording or broadcasting of the trial
proceedings,” which are due to begin Jan. 11.

In the trial, expected to last two to three weeks, Walker will rule without a jury on two same-sex couples' claim that the marriage ban
violates their federal constitutional rights.  

The measure was enacted by state voters in 2008 as Proposition 8.

Consideration of trial broadcasting was made possible when the Judicial Council of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced Dec. 17 that it had approved a pilot program allowing some televising of civil non-jury trials in nine western states.

If the Proposition 8 trial is televised, it would be the first federal trial to be broadcast in the West, and one of the first in the
nation.

Cameras have previously been allowed in some federal appeals court hearings as well as in California's state court system.

Walker gave lawyers on both sides of the Proposition 8 case until Jan. 4 to say whether they object to the limited recording of the Jan. 6
hearing.

Charles Cooper, a lawyer for the sponsors of the measure, told Walker in filings earlier this week that his clients oppose televising the
trial.

He said the Proposition 8 sponsors are concerned about possible intimidation or harassment of witnesses. Some witnesses have said “they will not be willing to testify at all if the trial is televised or webcast,” Cooper wrote.

But Theodore Boutrous, a lawyer for the same-sex couples, told the judge that his clients “strongly support televising the trial in order to
afford the public meaningful access in this exceptionally important case.”

Ten media organizations have told the judge they would like to provide gavel-to-gavel broadcast and webcast coverage of the trial, with pool coverage handled by In Session, formerly known as Court TV.

The purpose of the Jan. 6 hearing is to resolve last-minute evidence disputes before the trial.

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Riders should expect big changes when Muni rail returns in August

Reconfigured routes will mean fewer, longer trains through tunnel

New audio of couple calling police on SF man bolsters racial bias claims, supe says

Pacific Heights incident spurred CAREN Act to outlaw discriminatory reports to police

SFUSD students may start the school year at home

Staff report recommends starting with distance learning in the fall, transitioning to hybrid model

Universities fight new immigration restrictions on international students in court

Local colleges are scrambling to keep international students in the country as… Continue reading

SF library plans to reopen with pickup and drop-off services

Since March, all 28 library locations in San Francisco have been closed… Continue reading

Most Read