In San Francisco, finishing third means you can win

The San Francisco mayor race is looking a lot like Bay to Breakers — plenty of entrants, many characters and a few professional runners.

Yet given that the winner will be decided by the chaotic and confusing system called ranked-choice voting for the first time, the theme of the campaign is becoming clearer.

Hello, whiskey — it is us, San Francisco’s unsteady voters.

With the field beginning to take shape, people are starting to focus on the fact that a second- or third-place finisher in the race could ultimately be the next mayor of San Francisco, a scenario so ludicrous it has some groups in town eyeing a ballot measure to undo ranked-choice voting to stop the madness.

Unfortunately, that measure would not be ready until voters go to the polls to elect the next mayor, so it will be too late to block another possible fluke in the ongoing election experiment that saw Jean Quan recently elevated as Oakland’s mayor.

It is too early to see how that deal is going to work out, but the early indications are not swell. And it does not bode well for San Francisco that all the political consultants in town — already raking in big bucks — admit they have no clue how the race is going to play out this year.

I do not know about you, but I do not like to have the terms “clueless” and “election” linked in the same sentence, let alone for who might be running San Francisco for the next four years. But it is before us.

“We have no idea, and any person who says they do is crazy,” said consultant David Latterman, who has yet to sign up with any mayoral campaign. “It’s unprecedented at this level because no one has experienced it yet. With the [ranked-choice voting] configuration, it could just come down to dumb luck.”

Now that termed-out Supervisor (“any office sounds good’’) Michela Alioto-Pier has joined City Attorney Dennis Herrera, former board colleague Bevan Dufty, state Sen. Leland Yee, Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting and venture capitalist Joanna Rees in the race, we know only a few certain things.

The next mayor of San Francisco could likely win with only about 20 percent of the vote, which is, shall we say, slightly less than the 70 percent Gavin Newsom garnered when he won re-election.

The new election system, which can reject its top contender after the first round, could ultimately pick the winner on a statistical oddity.

And, eyeing that vote split among the candidates, it is almost certain others will jump in, because roulette wheels are designed to entice more gambling.

Most people are betting Supervisor David Chiu will enter the race soon, hot after his sleek handling of the political play that saw the surprise elevation of Ed Lee as interim mayor and Chiu’s ability to keep his seat as board president.

Most people believe Chiu would immediately be a top-tier candidate with the major fundraisers Herrera and Yee so far, but that is not taking in one other element that has yet to gather mainstream momentum.

That would be the growing chorus of people who are quietly encouraging Lee to forego the “interim’’ tag and continue on as the next elected mayor of San Francisco.

In the past week, I have heard from a number of political insiders and business types who believe the steady, stately Lee would be the best choice to continue to lead the city — and that was before the ongoing deal to keep microblogging giant Twitter from leaving San Francisco and instead installing the company as the centerpiece of mid-Market Street’s future rejuvenation.

This week, Lee told me he is flattered by the support, but he remains committed to his “one-year, non­political” approach to tackling The City’s budget deficit, reforming the pension system and otherwise doing what only a person with a limited term could do.

“This city deserves to elect its mayor,” he told me. But he did not say no.

Things change. There was a time when we had an election system in which people understood that a third-place finisher could not win. And pollsters, before ranked-choice voting, could fairly accurately measure the mood of the electorate.

That is now quaintly referred to as the good old days.

Bay Area NewsDennis HerreraLocalNews ColumnistsSan Francisco

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Deputy public defender Chris Garcia outside the Hall of Justice on Wednesday, June 16, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
As pandemic wanes, SF public defender hopes clients will get ‘their day in court’

Like other attorneys in San Francisco, Deputy Public Defender Chris Garcia has… Continue reading

Hyphen hosts a group show at Space Gallery in San Francisco in 2010. (Photo courtesy of Albert Law/Pork Belly Studio)
What’s in a name? Asian American magazine fights to keep its identity

An investor-backed media group laid claim to the moniker of SF’s long-running Hyphen magazine, sparking a conversation about writing over community history

A warning notice sits under the windshield wiper of a recreational vehicle belonging to a homeless man named David as it sits parked on De Wolf Street near Alemany Boulevard on Friday, Aug. 31, 2018. A proposed SF Municipal Transportation Agency law would make it illegal for overnight parking on the side street for vehicles taller than seven feet or longer than 22 feet. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Fight over ‘poverty tows’ heats up

‘What can we do to ensure the vehicle stays in the hands of the owner?’

Crab fisherman Skip Ward of Marysville casts his crab net out off a pier near Fort Point. (Craig Lee/Special to The	Examiner)
San Francisco came back to life, and we captured it all

Last spring, in the early days of the pandemic, the bestselling authors… Continue reading

Revelers at Madrone Art Bar in the early hours of June 15, 2021 (Courtesy Power Quevedo).
No social distancing at Motown-themed dance party

‘I don’t care how anyone feels, I just want to dance!’

Most Read