The Port of San Francisco, which controls much of the The City’s waterfront, faces potential layoffs due to a financial crisis caused by the pandemic. 
Steven Ho/
Special to S.F. Examiner

The Port of San Francisco, which controls much of the The City’s waterfront, faces potential layoffs due to a financial crisis caused by the pandemic. Steven Ho/ Special to S.F. Examiner

In a financial ‘crisis,’ SF Port officials lobby for stimulus funding

Looking to right their financial ship, Port of San Francisco officials are hoping to secure $60 million in federal stimulus dollars after revenues dropped by nearly half due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Port has not received any federal stimulus funding since the start of the pandemic, unlike The City’s other enterprise departments such as the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and the San Francisco International Airport. But Port officials are lobbying Sacramento officials for funding from the most recently passed federal stimulus package, the American Rescue Plan Act.

“The Port is in a crisis,” Elaine Forbes, executive director of the Port of San Francisco, told the Board of Supervisors Budget and Appropriations Committee this week. “We have cut our capital budget to below life support. We’ve used our savings and we will be facing layoffs of essential employees without support and tools to right our ship. Our revenues have fallen nearly 50% for a total loss of $60 million and a projected $80 million over the next two years.”

According to Katie Petrucione, the Port of San Francisco’s chief financial officer, ports were not included in previous federal COVID relief bills, but that “on behalf of the Port of San Francisco [House] Speaker Nancy Pelosi inserted language into” the American Rescue Plan to allow ports access to the funding.

“Port staff along with the California Association of Port Authorities and the Port of San Francisco have lobbied to request a $250 million allocation to California’s ports to cover pandemic-related revenue losses,” Petrucione told the committee. “San Francisco has requested a sub-allocation of $60 million, including $15 million to cover lost cruise passenger tariff revenue.”

As previously reported by the San Francisco Examiner, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a “no sail” order for cruise ships in March 2020 due to COVID-19, which forced the cancellations of 198 scheduled cruises into the Port of San Francisco. The CDC has said it may allow cruises to set sail again on U.S. waters by mid-July.

The loss of cruise revenue is just one of the hits to the Port’s revenues during the pandemic. Rent payments have also plummeted from the Port’s tenants. The agency has forgiven about $14 million in rent for 225 tenants to help them weather the economic toll and has also deferred collecting tens of millions of dollars in rent from others. Parking revenue has also taken a dive. There was a 54% drop in the past year compared to before the pandemic, a decline from $20.1 million to $9.3 million, according to Port officials.

California’s share of the federal stimulus recovery funding is about $26 billion. Port officials remain in conversations to secure the stimulus funding. It’s unclear when they may receive an answer.

Lt. Governor Eleni Kounalakis, a former Port Commission member and current chair of the State Lands Commission, is among those who recently wrote to Gov. Gavin Newsom to request the stimulus funds for the ports.

Kounalakis addressed the financial challenges facing ports like those in San Francisco and San Diego in an April 22 letter to Newsom and called them “a critical component of California’s economic recovery.”

“California’s ports are backbones to local economies and home to treasured local, regional and international tourism destinations,” she wrote. “Supporting local ports now will save thousands of jobs and ensure speedy economic recovery for California.”

Port officials have a strategy to navigate from out of stormy economic times to avoid layoffs in their proposed budget next fiscal year, which begins July 1. That includes repurposing $17.7 million in funding from “low priority capital projects” that was previously allocated as well as $9.1 million from completed or overfunded projects, not hiring for vacant positions and pursuing a $20 million loan from The City.

In fiscal year 2019-2020, the Port’s annual budget was $146.8 million, which declined in the current fiscal year to $124.8 million, according to The City’s adopted two-year budget. The Port has proposed a $131 million budget for next fiscal year.

“To date, the Port has managed the pandemic recession through a combination of expenditure reductions, decreases to future capital investments, defunding prior capital projects, and use of fund balance,” Forbes wrote in an April 23 memo to the Port Commission. “While this approach has maintained critical operations and minimized short term impact to the organization, it is simply unsustainable in the long term. The Port has a $1 billion state-of-good repair capital backlog and forecasted need of an additional $1 billion over the next 10 years.”

She added that “reliance on fund balance, the port’s sole reserve, is untenable without substantially risking its bond ratings as well as its ability to continue operations through additional unforeseen events.”

Port officials said the pandemic has reduced their revenues to a level not seen since 2005 and forecast they will not fully recover for another five years.

Randy Quezada, a Port spokesperson, said the stimulus funding is part of “several strategies to address what will be a five-year recovery.”

“All stimulus money received will go towards avoiding layoffs, reimbursement to the port for tenant relief and rent forgiveness and restore capital maintenance repairs that keep the waterfront safe and secure,” Quezada said Thursday. “It will also replenish savings that we have drawn down in order to support port workers and small businesses.”

Bay Area Newssan francisco news

Just Posted

Dominion Voting Systems, a Denver-based vendor, is under contract to supply voting machines for elections in San Francisco. (Kevin N. Hume/Examiner file)
Is San Francisco’s elections director impeding voting machine progress?

Open source technology could break up existing monopoly

The 49ers take on the Packers in Week 3 of the NFL season, before heading into a tough stretch of divisional opponents. (Courtesy San Francisco 49ers)
‘Good for Ball’ or ‘Bad for Ball’ — A Niners analysis

By Mychael Urban Special to The Examiner What’s the first thing that… Continue reading

Health experts praised Salesforce for keeping its Dreamforce conference at Moscone Center outdoors and on a small scale. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Happy birthday, Marc Benioff. Your company did the right thing

Salesforce kept Dreamforce small, which made all kinds of sense

ose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014. 
Rose Pak and Willie Brown at an event in 2014.
Willie and Rose: An alliance for the ages

How the Mayor and Chinatown activist shaped San Francisco, then and now

The Grove in Golden Gate Park is maintained largely by those who remember San Francisco’s 20,000 AIDS victims. (Open Eye Pictures/New York Times)
COVID deaths approach a grim milestone

AIDS took 40 years to claim 700,000 lives. COVID surpassed that number in 21 months

Most Read